Am Dienstag 18 August 2009 schrieb houghi@houghi.org:
Quoting Bryen M Yunashko
: What he's saying is that with a better improved zypper with in-place live updating, it would be less painful for some people to update and the 18 or 24 months become less relevant.
That implies that if the `zypper dup` sucks, it will be relevant.
Would it not be a good idea to say that if all is well, we go to 18 months, but if there are still serious issues, we stay with 24 months?
What I mean is to still have an official statement of 18 months, but the realization that if there are issues, we still can go to 24 months for 11.2.
That depends on how you define "we", Novell will not. If you wants to, I'm sure we (openSUSE) find a way. Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org