On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Joerg
Schilling
Stephan Kleine
wrote: As far as I understand the whole problem is the license so why don't you dual license it under CDDL as well as some GPL? Someone on fedora-legal asked the same but didn't get an answer (or I failed to find it).
Could you please stop this?
You are trying to claim that there is a license problem in the original software although it has been verified that there is no such problem.
I'm not trying to claim anything here but saying that: 1. The whole mess is about the license. 2. You, as the author, are the only one who could dual license it to stop such discussions once and for all. 3. You were already asked on fedora-legal if you could dual license it but didn't answer afaik. 4. You ignored the main content of the mail and concentrated again on that legal "is it true or not" discussion instead of simply answering if dual licensing would be an option for you. So, once again: Would dual licensing it under CDDL & GPL be an option for you? If not, why? Regards, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org