23 May
2006
23 May
'06
12:00
Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Frank-Michael Fischer <fmfischer@gmx.net> writes:
The reason why I am assuming it's libzypp's fault is: when I filed the bug it was for the Zen component, then Nat Budin changed the component to libzypp and connected this bug with bug 176301. This bug I am not supposed to view. So it's fair to guess there is something rotten in the state of libzypp. And we should not participate, just sit and wait.
Why is everybody thinking there's something rotten going on if a bug is closed?
Not because it's closed. I could not even know that. It's because I am not supposed to know the bug. This creates the "rotten" suspicion. FMF