Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-doc (46 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-doc] LfL RFC
  • From: "Rajko M." <rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 18:37:32 -0600
  • Message-id: <200612211837.33234.rmatov101@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On Thursday 21 December 2006 01:22, Rebecca Walter wrote:
> Cool! Lot's of feedback. It is great for me to have feedback and editors
> because I haven't written as much lately (usually I'm the editor) and I can
> never look as critically at my own work as I can at others' work.
> Also this is a somewhat technical topic and my method might not be the best
> way to do it. It seems to have worked okay on my systems at home, but I
> have this fear that someone will find a huge security bug in it and I'd
> hate to be offering this as a good way to do it if it were actually
> dangerous. ;-)

You have in house security guys that can tell much more about.
The home networks on this side of the big water are usually designed around
routers or router+modem combos. Configuration is pretty straight forward and
has not much common with SUSE so it probably will not find place in first
articles in LfL, but eventually it has to be taken in consideration as some
configurations have to be explained as they are not intuitive at all.

> > I'm not sure what exactly was meant under "make System Administration a
> > part" My guess would be something like this:
> > System Administration (book or part of the book)
> > Network Configuration (chapter)
> > Home Network (subchapter)
> > Network with Router
> > Network with Local Server (your article)
> > Is this what you meant.
> Right. Toms can probably explain parts better than I can but that is
> basically it. A part is a bigger chunk than a chapter but smaller than a
> book. The internally-produced manuals have parts in them.


> Right now System Administration is a chapter and my text is a sect1. But
> System Administration is a pretty broad topic, so this could easily turn
> into a huge and unmanageable chapter depending on how many other topics are
> added.

System administration is broad enough for the book, so raising it to the part
might not be enough, but as you said

> It is a bit hard to make a good structure when we don't know exactly what
> the content will be in the long run. Right now if each text is made as a
> sect1, they are pretty mobile. But we probably want to get a better idea
> soon of what we expect so we can work out a good structure and set it up so
> authors can contribute more comfortably.
> > BTW, how to give comments on used words. I've seen "stipulated by your
> > ISP" and mostly is used "provided", instead.
> You just tell me what you think. ;-) You're right, stipulated isn't the
> best wording. How about assigned?

Assigned, provided,
furnished (is a bit unusual, but still correct).
The stipulated is legal term.
Did I mention that is my favorite vocabulary.

Regards, Rajko.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-doc+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-doc+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups