On Mittwoch, 20. März 2013, 19:03:00 wrote Malcolm Fernandes:
[MF-03/19/2013] Some more observations. The OBS project having issues had rebuild="direct" in the project meta, while my home project (which does not have problems) does not have that attribute. I believe rebuild="transitive" is the default. When I added the rebuild="direct" in the project meta of my home project, it also exhibited the build dependency issues. I'm guessing I should remove the rebuild="direct" in the project meta and let it default to 'transitive'. Any thoughts on this?
yes. It is the default for a good reason :)
[MF] ok thanks.
What is the project meta and the repository rebuild strategy? [MF] This is an extract of the project meta: <repository rebuild="direct" name="standard"> <arch>armv8el</arch>
Uh, you really use that one? You are aware that this architecture never existed and actually got called "aarch64" meanwhile?
[MF] Not sure why you say 'armv8el' never existed. I see it referenced in the OBS codebase (2.3.1), while I cannot see any references of 'aarch64':
Yes, but real armv8el hardware never existed. It got called aarch64 instead. The armv8 slipped inside to OBS code base via a mistake. I just not removed it since some users use it already (as a workaround for generic dependency problems in their code base).
/srv/www/obs/api/public/schema/obs.rng /srv/www/obs/api/db/seeds.rb /srv/www/obs/api/test/fixtures/architectures.yml /srv/www/obs/docs/api/obs.rng /usr/lib/obs/server/build/build /usr/lib/obs/server/build/Build.pm ....
Cheers,
Mal
-- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH email: adrian@suse.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@opensuse.org