Hi Martin, On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 06:57:30 +0100, Martin Mohring wrote:
A lag of half a year sounds like a bit of a too strong safety belt to me.
There is no "openSUSE:Tools:Unstable" that I can see either. (It's sheer existence wouldn't actually mean that anyone tests it anyway.)
I propose to surface changes much earlier, release early and often, you know, to keep breakage small and revertible.
We can also test the svn version, I suppose, can't we?
I do that regularily with a "larger setup" and also some big projects mirrored from build.o.o, and testing this also :-)
That's good to know. My concern is that if we don't have anybody who updates the stable build package, we will much less have anyone who additinally updates an unstable package.
I had already asked to put a copy into openSUSE:Tools:Unstable, but have no permission, to get openSUSE:Tools:Unstable lets say every week or so, or when some new features are to be tested.
Knowing that you would like to work in this area, it should be no problem at all to get you the required permissions. Adrian?
Where should the rails 2.0 copy (e.g. from darix) go? Also into openSUSE:Tools:Unstable?
Cheers, Martin
Peter -- "WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development