(In reply to Martin Pluskal from comment #8)
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=982132#c11 seems you are staying in the same line of those 'unlogical' decision makers.
https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742756#c6 seems you keep everything stored somewhere to bring it up again after 3 years.
- run) informing reporter that this BUG will get closed when not changed to a valid version until the due date of the second run
- run) closing the BUG as you did with the batch.
Nobody said that there is "probably no interest to fix" neither paying attention to a BUG, nor adding a valuable comment is just saying this ... there isn't anyone 'extra' needed to say this loud
That is apparently more complex then what was done here, or what any other distribution is doing - but if you find time to implement this somehow I am sure it will be greatly appreciated where is the complexity to run this batch twice ?
Nobody said that either - both are straw man argumentation fallacies [1] this is the logical consequence of not paying attention to a BUG ...
When you have so much time to search through bugs about my comments, then you should better add meaningful excuses why orhpaned BUG's don't get attention as they should get ... Thank you query much for your interest in my time and how I spend it. If you feel that bugs that got closed without any attention need to be excused I guess
http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986851 http://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986851#c10 --- Comment #10 from Martin Pluskal <mpluskal@suse.com> --- (In reply to Christian Wittmer from comment #9) there is something wrong with your expectations of openSUSE - nobody is promising you anything, there is no obligation or entitlement, though you apparently feel entitled ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.