Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (3354 mails)

< Previous Next >
[Bug 936463] cross-*-gcc5 seems to lack some required files
  • From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:43:26 +0000
  • Message-id: <bug-936463-21960-ABXc1N8Us0@http.bugzilla.opensuse.org/>
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936463
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=936463#c25

Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.d
| |e

--- Comment #25 from Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #21)

As it works for me with some targets isn't it only a disconnect between the
binutils and cross-gcc target triplets? There must be some configure magic
to tell GCC not only about the build tools to use but about the tools to use
in the installed system. --with-as/--with-ld might work here I guess?
I really don't like the extra symlinks.

Or we want to forgo with the idea to have multiple cross toolchains for the
"same" target (like armv6hl and armv7hl as they just differ in their
set of default target options). Or we stop producing just a single
cross-binutils package for them.

I also strongly prefer to have just one compiler for arm. Rationale:

1. cross-armv6hl-gcc and cross-armv7hl-gcc are essentially identical
* same set of possible targets
* both have "--with-float=hard"
2. everyone else uses an arm-<foo>-gnueabi triplet

Only minor downside is a little bit of convenience, as one builds by default
for the instruction set of the RPi1, the other one for everything else.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages