https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794744
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794744#c12
Rob Verduijn changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |REOPENED
InfoProvider|rob.verduijn@gmail.com |
--- Comment #12 from Rob Verduijn 2013-03-06 19:10:19 UTC ---
Hello,
I have no doubt there is a lot of demand for the 'samba4 ad controller'
support.
I've found a lot of the annoyances that samba3 has where dealt with in samba4.
But as long as the heimdal/MIT kerberos problem isn't solved I think your idea
for an AD DC enabled build is a good one.
I would suggest adding another build that uses the --with-system-mitkrb5
switch, since that one restricts the build to the samba3 binaries and samba4
client only.
(since it's not used in samba:TESTING)
I think the community will apreciate the availability of the packages even if
they are :"use at your own risk".
It will allow everybody to try it and see what it's worth.
Just make sure it is known that it will be a serious problem when its not a
dedicated server. (big warning when enabling samba4 ad and again when starting
up, links to website with warnings all over the screen and in the logs)
Also if you want me to help in getting the package on the level of quality or
any other opensuse community member a bit more info from the side of opensuse
would be apreciated.
Regarding all the magic that is required on how to build samba3/4 deserves some
more attention, why are certain buildrequirements needed and why is this option
on and that one off.
Or why the mit/heimdal kerberos thing is an issue, and maybe an explanation on
why MIT and not heimdal for system wide use in opensuse. (just to name a few
that come to mind)
I know a few of the answers from redhat/fedora
for those that don't :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/MIT_KDC
Regards
Rob
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
