https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758499 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758499#c2 andreas bittner <abittner@abittner.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW InfoProvider|abittner@abittner.de | --- Comment #2 from andreas bittner <abittner@abittner.de> 2012-04-24 18:37:50 UTC --- I added your repo, on x86-64, but still rpm -aq | grep -i microco microcode_ctl-1.17-166.1.x86_64 dmesg [ 4.372807] microcode: CPU0: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 4.611176] udevd[299]: starting version 181 [ 5.007109] EXT4-fs (sda2): re-mounted. Opts: acl,user_xattr [ 5.997782] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 5.997894] microcode: CPU1: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 5.998558] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 5.998673] microcode: CPU2: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 6.064467] input: PC Speaker as /devices/platform/pcspkr/input/input5 [ 6.098980] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 6.099128] microcode: CPU3: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 6.099598] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 6.099677] microcode: CPU4: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 6.099932] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 6.100013] microcode: CPU5: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 6.100255] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 6.100339] microcode: CPU6: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 6.100562] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 6.100639] microcode: CPU7: patch_level=0x06000623 [ 6.100863] microcode: failed to load file amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin [ 6.100975] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00 <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba the yast2 package manager doesnt show any changelog after december 2011 I think. did you update the package? or only a nonofficial quick hack or something? just as a reminder, this is an amd cpu, not intel or so, because the whole package description is talking about intel..... Linux linux-ozan 3.3.0-2-desktop #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Mar 24 00:11:53 UTC 2012 (7e9dd21) x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [ 0.005543] tseg: 00bdf00000 [ 0.005544] CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0 [ 0.005545] CPU: Processor Core ID: 0 [ 0.005547] mce: CPU supports 7 MCE banks [ 0.006076] ACPI: Core revision 20120111 [ 0.010372] ..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1 [ 0.020940] CPU0: AMD FX(tm)-8150 Eight-Core Processor stepping 02 [ 0.020998] Performance Events: AMD Family 15h PMU driver. [ 0.020998] ... version: 0 [ 0.020998] ... bit width: 48 [ 0.020998] ... generic registers: 6 [ 0.020998] ... value mask: 0000ffffffffffff [ 0.020998] ... max period: 00007fffffffffff [ 0.020998] ... fixed-purpose events: 0 [ 0.020998] ... event mask: 000000000000003f [ 0.028086] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.036022] Booting Node 0, Processors #1 [ 0.036023] smpboot cpu 1: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.048022] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.054013] #2 [ 0.054014] smpboot cpu 2: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.066018] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.072008] #3 [ 0.072010] smpboot cpu 3: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.084013] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.090009] #4 [ 0.090010] smpboot cpu 4: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.102017] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.108005] #5 [ 0.108006] smpboot cpu 5: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.120017] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.126003] #6 [ 0.126004] smpboot cpu 6: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.138017] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.144000] #7 Ok. [ 0.144002] smpboot cpu 7: start_ip = 98000 [ 0.156017] NMI watchdog enabled, takes one hw-pmu counter. [ 0.157993] Brought up 8 CPUs [ 0.157995] Total of 8 processors activated (57798.60 BogoMIPS). I dont have this system for very long, if any more patches or tasks, I cant be of a help if it takes too long. regards. thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.