https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456469
User ro@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456469#c4
Ruediger Oertel changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Info Provider| |lmuelle@novell.com
Priority|P5 - None |P0 - Crit Sit
--- Comment #4 from Ruediger Oertel 2008-12-07 18:26:24 MST ---
11.1 does have different fillup macros, but 11.0 does use the same
ones as 10.3 (and back to 10.1)
but your specfile shows a difference:
10.3: %fillup_and_insserv -fy smbfs
11.0: %{?fillup_and_insserv -fy smbfs}
looks like this conditional expansion breaks rpms option parser,
do you really need to write it this way ?
BTW:
if [ ${1:-0} -eq 1 ]; then
# Only insserv smbfs if we're not in update mode.
%{?fillup_and_insserv -fy smbfs}
that "if" has never been necessary. "-y" does only enable a script
during initial installation of a package, "-Y" does always enable it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.