https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=375195 Summary: gmime-sharp fails when used by beagle Product: openSUSE 11.0 Version: Alpha 3 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Status: NEW Severity: Critical Priority: P5 - None Component: GNOME AssignedTo: sbrabec@novell.com ReportedBy: jpr@novell.com QAContact: qa@suse.de Found By: --- gmime-sharp fails when used by beagle in at least some cases with: ** ** gmime:ERROR:(gmime-stream-fs.c:283):stream_seek: code should not be reached Stacktrace: at (wrapper managed-to-native) GMime.Stream.g_mime_stream_seek (intptr,intptr,int) <0x00004> at (wrapper managed-to-native) GMime.Stream.g_mime_stream_seek (intptr,intptr,int) <0xffffffff> at GMime.Stream.Seek (long,GMime.SeekWhence) <0x00077> at GMime.Stream.Seek (long) <0x00012> at Beagle.Daemon.EvolutionMailQueryable.EvolutionMailIndexableGeneratorMbox.HasNextIndexable () <0x00282> at AddGeneratorTask.DoTaskReal () <0x00025> at Task.DoTask () <0x000ff> at Beagle.Util.Scheduler.Worker () <0x02ac7> at Beagle.Util.ExceptionHandlingThread.ThreadStarted () <0x002c5> at (wrapper delegate-invoke) System.MulticastDelegate.invoke_void () <0xffffffff> at (wrapper runtime-invoke) System.IO.FileStream.runtime_invoke_void (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) <0xffffffff> Native stacktrace: beagled [0x817320e] [0xffffe410] /lib/libc.so.6(abort+0x188) [0xb7e60f18] /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_assertion_message+0x129) [0xb8043369] /usr/lib/libgmime-2.0.so.3 [0xb4ee3829] /usr/lib/libgmime-2.0.so.3(g_mime_stream_seek+0x9d) [0xb4edefcd] [0xb513acc1] [0xb513a380] [0xb513a2f3] [0xb5153ebb] [0xb5153b26] [0xb5153478] [0xb5150e70] [0xb6814c26] [0xb6814932] [0xb686ea01] beagled(mono_runtime_delegate_invoke+0x35) [0x80e3475] beagled [0x80c1c17] beagled [0x811874e] beagled [0x8133d85] /lib/libpthread.so.0 [0xb7fa3155] /lib/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e) [0xb7f0169e] Debug info from gdb: (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb7e348f0 (LWP 24530)] [New Thread 0xb4e9db90 (LWP 24541)] [New Thread 0xb5024b90 (LWP 24540)] [New Thread 0xb5125b90 (LWP 24539)] [New Thread 0xb5268b90 (LWP 24538)] [New Thread 0xb65f2b90 (LWP 24535)] [New Thread 0xb66f3b90 (LWP 24534)] [New Thread 0xb6804b90 (LWP 24533)] [New Thread 0xb74feb90 (LWP 24532)] [New Thread 0xb7522b90 (LWP 24531)] 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 10 Thread 0xb7522b90 (LWP 24531) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 9 Thread 0xb74feb90 (LWP 24532) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 8 Thread 0xb6804b90 (LWP 24533) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 7 Thread 0xb66f3b90 (LWP 24534) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 6 Thread 0xb65f2b90 (LWP 24535) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 5 Thread 0xb5268b90 (LWP 24538) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 4 Thread 0xb5125b90 (LWP 24539) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 3 Thread 0xb5024b90 (LWP 24540) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 2 Thread 0xb4e9db90 (LWP 24541) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () 1 Thread 0xb7e348f0 (LWP 24530) 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () Thread 10 (Thread 0xb7522b90 (LWP 24531)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7faa3a6 in nanosleep () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x08112c98 in ?? () #3 0xb7522394 in ?? () #4 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 9 (Thread 0xb74feb90 (LWP 24532)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e5fa6d in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0812fce3 in ?? () #3 0x08209040 in ?? () #4 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 8 (Thread 0xb6804b90 (LWP 24533)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e5fa6d in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0812fce3 in ?? () #3 0x08209040 in ?? () #4 0xb68038e0 in ?? () #5 0x08550c34 in ?? () #6 0x08221488 in ?? () #7 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 7 (Thread 0xb66f3b90 (LWP 24534)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e5fa6d in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0812fce3 in ?? () #3 0x08209040 in ?? () #4 0x00000005 in ?? () #5 0xb66f2c18 in ?? () #6 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 6 (Thread 0xb65f2b90 (LWP 24535)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e5fa6d in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0812fce3 in ?? () #3 0x08209040 in ?? () #4 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 5 (Thread 0xb5268b90 (LWP 24538)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7fa8ec5 in sem_wait@@GLIBC_2.1 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x0812fabc in ?? () #3 0x0820ade4 in ?? () #4 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 4 (Thread 0xb5125b90 (LWP 24539)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7e5fa6d in sigsuspend () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0812fce3 in ?? () #3 0x08209040 in ?? () #4 0xb7e375a4 in ?? () from /lib/libc.so.6 #5 0xb4d8f000 in ?? () #6 0x00000000 in ?? () Thread 3 (Thread 0xb5024b90 (LWP 24540)): #0 0xffffe430 in __kernel_vsyscall () I believe it is a marshaling error caused by the patches related to bug 344662. This occurs even after adapting the goffset patches to 2.2.18. Stanislav, is there really no way to drop these patches? I don't think its right to be floating our own binary interface even if its broken upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.