https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=310518#c5
Johannes Meixner changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
Info Provider| |jsrain@novell.com
--- Comment #5 from Johannes Meixner 2007-10-31 03:43:04 MST ---
Jiri,
can you tell me if you have time to extend the dialog soon
so that I could use it for testing for 11.0 (i.e. so that we
have it really ready before the first 11.0 beta).
Currently I don't have an ideal place in mind where optional
additional buttons should appear.
I contrast to my initial comment #0 I think now it is perhaps
not good to have additional buttons between the table and the
rich-text because table and rich-text should always look
concatenated.
Therefore optional additional buttons should be placed over the
table or below the rich-text.
I don't know which place is better.
I think the place depends on the meaning of the additional button.
For example if an additional button changes the content or the
meaning of the table+rich-text (like in this enhancement request),
it might be best placed above the table+rich-text?
In contrast if an additional button offers an additional functionality
which should be directly accessible (and not hidden under [other])
e.g. something like [autodetect parallel port scanners], it might be
best placed below the table+rich-text?
By the way:
Another example of optional additional stuff which should be
placed over the table+rich-text would be a text-entry together
with a [search] button which would be useful if there are tons
of entries in the table.
Therefore it might be a good idea when the dialog could be
extended not only with buttons?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.