Hey,m On 09.08.2010 19:31, Egbert Eich wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 12:06:01PM +0200, Henne Vogelsang wrote:
On 08/06/2010 07:31 PM, Egbert Eich wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:46:58PM +0200, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
Indeed for someone working at a company like Novell for a while it may feel strange to discuss things with collegues in public: - Should one really openly 'flame' fellow Novell employees (AJ, Michael, coolo, the Boosters, ...) or decisions made by them? - What things can a Novell employee say in public? How much are the things one says influenced by internal knowledge that's not ment for public digestion?
I have this myself - I don't know where I stand being both a Novell employee and a community member. Something I want to discuss with ppl in person a bit anyway so I'll take it up with them too.
Finally people speak up - and I'm sure others will go again: "oh, no, this should have been an internal discussion".
I never heard "oh, no, this should have been an internal discussion" anywhere! And believe me I am usually part of the nasty discussions ;-).
You may be too intimidating ;P
Yeah right :P
I do believe this is a fear that we need to manage somehow. They don't have this in their upstream communities right?
Of course not. There is no contractual relationship between the project and the contributor. Everyone just contributes as an individual. There is a difference if you post on LKML or some freedesktop.org ML with a Novell mailing address or if you do this in the openSUSE project. At least this perception exists.
Then this is something we need to change. openSUSE is run in the same way as any other project they participate in: Contribuors voice their opinion no matter where they come from. Henne -- Henne Vogelsang, openSUSE. Everybody has a plan, until they get hit. - Mike Tyson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-boosters+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-boosters+help@opensuse.org