Am 30. Juni 2011 12:40 schrieb Henne Vogelsang
[...] Ich empfehle dir
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Licensing_update
als Ausgangspunkt. Das ist zwar nur eine Interpretation der Lizenz von Wikimedia. Das hat aber sogar die FSF "zugestimmt" und die GFDL dahingehend verändert das eine Doppellizensierung von GFDL Wiki Inhalten mit CC-BY-SA einfach möglich ist.
[...] If I understood all the right way: That option (in the Version 1.3 from the 3 November 2008) was was limited -> see: GNU Free Documentation License Version 1.3, 3 November 2008 Section: 11. RELICENSING http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.html and GFDL v1.3 FAQ http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl-1.3-faq.html Section: What is the purpose of the two different dates in section 11? Why did you choose those specific dates? Maybe the FSF would make a GFDL 1.4 or 1.3.1 or will make/will not something alike in the 2.0 for us (and others)? The 'latest' draft seems to be a bit old, see: http://gplv3.fsf.org/doclic-dd1-guide.html with link to http://gplv3.fsf.org/fdl-draft-2006-09-22.html Regards Martin -- -- - Martin Seidler - openSUSE profile: https://users.opensuse.org/show/pistazienfresser -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-bar+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-bar+help@opensuse.org