Re: [suse-amd64] nforce 250 - nvidia's sata controller

On Thursday 13 January 2005 10:40 am, Ron Lau wrote:

I tried the acpi off thing, still no SATA HD found.

I tried to install suse 9.2 manually, and loaded the sata_nv module. YaST still did not see the SATA HD.

Some other info, in case anyone cares...

The HD already has win2k pro, and a fully functional suse 9.1amd64 on it, from when it was installed in the original shuttle that had a silicon image sata controller. I can still get grub up, but when I select suse 9.1, I get a /dev/sda not found error.

From the site in the link provided by LeRoy: 1. Switch the motherboard BIOS back to "legacy ATA mode" (parallel ATA = PATA). Is it possible your bios is set in such a way it is looking for a /dev/hdx instead of /dev/sdx ? Doug ). I appears to me that something or some one changed the sent date of my reply after it left my computer. Even if there was a real delay, what happened to the other email with the same message sent on the same day from another email address (gmail)? On Thursday 13 January 2005 10:10 am, you wrote:

Doug, Kurt

-----Original Message----- From: Doug B [mailto:brucks@floresville.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2005 11:31 PM To: Joyce Mullen Subject: Headers from delayed email

Here are the headers from the original email in sent box. The date was 9 October

From: Doug B X-KMail-Transport: floresville To: "Kurt Mullen" Subject: smtp server

**** Date from my original email in my sent box**********************

Date: Sat, 9 Oct 2004 21:30:49 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline X-KMail-Identity: 2023710068 Content-Type: text/plain; � charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410092130.49661.Brucks@floresville.net> Status: RO X-Status: RS X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: X-KMail-MDN-Sent:

I got some mail returned tonight. �Reason stated was because the server was listed as a possible spam site.

The mail was sent using smtp.tgtservices.net. <snip> *******************************************************

Here is Kurt's reply. Note on the -----Original Message----- the sent date is 24 October. Something or someone modified that sent date.

Return-Path: Received: from server1.tgtservices.net (root@localhost) ��������by floresville.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9ONcRxQ018789 ��������for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:38:27 -0500 X-ClientAddr: 209.176.51.252 Received: from topguntelecom.com ([209.176.51.252]) ��������by server1.tgtservices.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9ONMR7o016766 ��������for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:22:27 -0500 Subject: RE: smtp server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; � charset="us-ascii" Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:25:08 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <2BB9C8633F35394C9C294A604BC35EFA041E5A@tgtserver1.TopGu