Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-amd64 (79 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [suse-amd64] 32-bits vs 64-bits MySQL performance
  • From: Mark Horton <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 07:12:34 +0000 (UTC)
  • Message-id: <3F9CC5C1.3010504@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
I've been load testing mysql on a dual opteron running suse 8.2beta-9 as well. But I've seen better performance with the 64-bit verion of mysql. I'm using mysql the 4.0.15-standard binaries from mysql's website.

The main difference is that I'm performance testing inserts not queries. In my tests the 32-bit version is about 20% slower that the 64-bit version, at least with the inserts I'm doing. I'm doing a very high volume of inserts.

One of the first things I did when I got the system was to run the mysql benchmark suite on both the 32 and 64 bit version. The 64-bit version was clearly faster here as well but I dont remember by how much.

I'm not sure how large your dataset is but if you want I could run the same tests on my system to see if they come out with simular results.

Mark


Kees Hoekzema wrote:
Hello list,

Finally I've got a working Opteron, so I decided to test its stability and speed. I imported a backup of the database it is going to run and ran a few queries we use in our scripts on them to test how fast it was.

We ran this script a few times with different concurrency levels using apache and ab and then we started a 32 bits mysql version and ran the same script with the same parameters again. There were some results I didn't expect.

These are the results I got:
First number is # threads, second and third queries/s, last is % difference

Threads 64 bits 32 bits %
1 1944,56 2462,48 26,6%
2 2893,32 3604,71 24,6%
3 2867,71 3654,71 27,4%
4 2818,35 3519,48 24,9%
5 2768,75 3478,66 25,6%

Apparently the 32 bits version of MySQL is almost 25% faster than the 64-bit flavor of MySQL. The queries used here are 'heavy' queries, not the average selects. Every result you see here above is the result of requesting 5000 times the script, resulting in approx. 250.000 queries on the MySQL server.

To avoid coincidences in the queries we chose, I made a second script, containing 'light' queries, the results:

Threads 64 bits 32 bits %
1 7091,16 6808,51 -4,0%
2 8358,85 8779,57 5,0%
3 9290,33 9678,81 4,2%
4 9346,16 10075,78 7,8%
5 9514,71 10289,20 8,1%
7 9495,10 10306,70 8,5%

Less difference, but the 32-bits version is still faster than the 64-bits, with more threads the difference gets up to 16%.

The used MySQL version is 4.0.16 for both 32 bits and 64 bits and I'm running SuSE Linux Beta Distribution version 8.2-beta9 with a 2.4.19-NUMA kernel on a Dual Opteron 246 w/ 4G RAM on an Tyan K8S motherboard.

After the benchmarks I have a few questions,
- Why is the 64-bits version so much slower than the 32-bits version? The 64-bits version is compiled with gcc 3.2.1 on a SuSE box (without optimalisations apparently), the 32-bits is compiled with gcc 2.95.3 with optimalisations '-O2 -mcpu=pentiumpro'.
Is the difference in performance due to these compiler options or is there something else I totally overlooked?

- Is it useful to compile my own MySQL (with gcc 3.3?) or do I have to wait until MySQL is better optimized for the Opteron?

A lot of questions and text, but I hope someone can enlighten me on this matter.

tia,
- kees




< Previous Next >
Follow Ups
References