On Friday, February 11, 2011 03:43:11 pm Robert Schweikert wrote:
Hi,
On 02/11/2011 05:24 AM, J. Daniel Schmidt wrote:
On Thursday 10 February 2011 23:21:17 Robert Schweikert wrote:
Attached is a revision of my original diagram incorporating some of the design style of the ASCII art above.
Differences:
- There is no lib common, the lib common layer of the ASCII art diagram is implemented by a modularized layer called "Configuration Modules".
You only gave it another name. I never said that the thing Thomas an I called "common lib" should be one blob, that any module has to load even if does not need it.
Correct, but using "lib" as a name implies that this is one piece. A library on the system is in one piece, you cannot load half of libc. I agree lib isn't a prefect name for it. Feel free to propose a better name. "Configuration module layer" or what ever.
<snip>
Reading your comments I really think that we basically meant the same,
Yes, I think we are pretty much on the same page. That's why I attempted to somewhat merge the two presentations of the architecture diagram.
And it appears that I have succeeded.
Robert
-- Thomas Goettlicher SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org