On Friday 11 February 2011 15:52:32 Robert Schweikert wrote:
With a good architecture diagram we should be able to [...] ^^^^ That's the point. Our ASCII art was just a plain copy of our offices white board (with a little cleaning up). The "common lib" was on the board called "SMC" in the first diagram and "SCM" in the second - but we knew what we were talking about. It was never meant to be perfect, just to have something to discuss about.
If we can achieve this, then it will be easy for contributors to get started.
Sure. In our current discussion its about what and how we want to change something, so we are in a much earlier phase here. I think that's why we did not invest too much for a perfect diagram that is just a base for a discussion and not developer documentation. Ciao, Daniel -- J. Daniel Schmidt <jdsn@suse.de> SUSE Linux Products GmbH Research & Development Maxfeldstr. 5 GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) D-90409 Nürnberg -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org