Hello Christin,
FYI: We have a new mailinglist for topics about www.opensuse.org. the wiki ml should stay for wiki thinks. On opensuse-web@opensuse.org you can reach all people who work on the openSUSE.org pages. So, if you want to contribute to the pages, please register on this mailing list (opensuse-web@opensuse.org => http://en.opensuse.org/Communicate/Mailinglists) .
On 21.12.2008, at 15:53, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
on Sonntag, 21. Dezember 2008, Christian Boltz wrote:
BTW: Are the software.o.o pages in some SVN? I couldn't find them on https://forgesvn1.novell.com/svn/opensuse/trunk/infrastructure/ ...
I got a reply off-list and was pointed to https://forgesvn1.novell.com/svn/opensuse/trunk/buildservice/src/software (and also got an offer for SVN write access)
The files are somewhat hidden, but grep helped to find them ;-) software.o.o-expert.html -> public/expert.html software.o.o-index.rhtml -> app/views/layouts/application_no_js.rhtml software.o.o-index-unused.rhtml -> app/views/layouts/application.rhtml (the application*.rhtml are nearly identical - I have no idea why both files are needed)
I just commited the fixes (r5996 for expert.html und r5967 for application*.rhtml). The remaining part for whoever has permissions to "svn up" software.o.o is: proofread my changes and run svn up ;-) (thanks to help.o.o, I already have write permissions *g*)
I take a look on your changes when am back in CW 1 2009. I can deploy them as well. Thank you for your engagement!
BTW2: It would be a good idea to move the table to a separate file that is included by the <noscript> area and expert.html. This would save duplicate work and also ensures both pages share the same bugs^Wcontent ;-)
Yep, this is on the todo list.
I still think so. Some more openSUSE-like look for expert.html would also be nice.
yep. Work in progress.
Wish you all a the best for 2009!
Cheers Robert
Regards,
Christian Boltz
[Passwörter] Ich suche nach einem Mittelweg zwischen maximaler Sicherheit und Zumutbarkeit für den Benutzer (ein Pferd mit Hufen, dem unsere Admin-Tastaturen viel zu klein sind :-)). [Manfred Rebentisch in suse-linux] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-wiki+help@opensuse.org
---
Robert Lihm, Webdesigner - Build Service Team SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg Tel: +49-911-74053-0 - rlihm@suse.de ____________________________________________________________ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ____________________________________________________________ SUSE - a Novell business
Hello,
on Samstag, 27. Dezember 2008, Robert Lihm wrote:
Hello Christin,
FYI: We have a new mailinglist for topics about www.opensuse.org. the wiki ml should stay for wiki thinks. On opensuse-web@opensuse.org you can reach all people who work on the openSUSE.org pages.
Good to know (did I miss the announcement about the new ML?) and a great idea :-)
On a related note: Currently the "wiki" component of product "openSUSE.org" has to be (ab)used for bugs related to the various *.opensuse.org pages. -> Would it make sense to have a separate component in bugzilla also?
please register on this mailing list (opensuse-web@opensuse.org =>
As you can see: done ;-)
Since this list is quite new and people started introducing theirself on what they do / can do, here's a short summary about what I'm doing in the web-releted area:
- HTML and CSS (hand-written with vi) - PHP, MySQL - Typo3 - web server administration (including postfix etc., but probably with less traffic than the openSUSE servers ;-) - postfixadmin developer
Wish you all a the best for 2009!
Thanks!
Regards,
Christian Boltz
Hi Christian!
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:11:33PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
on Samstag, 27. Dezember 2008, Robert Lihm wrote:
Hello Christin,
FYI: We have a new mailinglist for topics about www.opensuse.org. the wiki ml should stay for wiki thinks. On opensuse-web@opensuse.org you can reach all people who work on the openSUSE.org pages.
Good to know (did I miss the announcement about the new ML?) and a great idea :-)
you didn't miss it - we should probably have written one but didn't.
On a related note: Currently the "wiki" component of product "openSUSE.org" has to be (ab)used for bugs related to the various *.opensuse.org pages. -> Would it make sense to have a separate component in bugzilla also?
Yes, I think it sounds as if it would make sense. I don't have an overview about the components though, I regard myself a mere user of that part of infrastructure, and may miss something.
A somehow related component is "download infrastructure" which I own. It sometimes gets requests that would much better fit a "web pages" component.
please register on this mailing list (opensuse-web@opensuse.org =>
As you can see: done ;-)
Welcome, nice to have you here!
Peter
On 20.01.2009, at 18:26, Peter Poeml wrote:
Hi Christian!
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:11:33PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
on Samstag, 27. Dezember 2008, Robert Lihm wrote:
Hello Christin,
FYI: We have a new mailinglist for topics about www.opensuse.org. the wiki ml should stay for wiki thinks. On opensuse-web@opensuse.org you can reach all people who work on the openSUSE.org pages.
Good to know (did I miss the announcement about the new ML?) and a great idea :-)
you didn't miss it - we should probably have written one but didn't.
It's on Zonkers todo list. :-) But finally I could blog about it in the next days.
On a related note: Currently the "wiki" component of product "openSUSE.org" has to be (ab)used for bugs related to the various *.opensuse.org pages. -> Would it make sense to have a separate component in bugzilla also?
Yes, I think it sounds as if it would make sense. I don't have an overview about the components though, I regard myself a mere user of that part of infrastructure, and may miss something.
A somehow related component is "download infrastructure" which I own. It sometimes gets requests that would much better fit a "web pages" component.
please register on this mailing list (opensuse-web@opensuse.org =>
As you can see: done ;-)
Welcome, nice to have you here!
Peter
-- Contact: admin@opensuse.org (a.k.a. ftpadmin@suse.com) #opensuse-mirrors on freenode.net Info: http://en.opensuse.org/Mirror_Infrastructure
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH Research & Development
---
Robert Lihm, Webdesigner - Build Service Team SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg Tel: +49-911-74053-0 - rlihm@suse.de ____________________________________________________________ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ____________________________________________________________ SUSE - a Novell business
Hello,
on Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009, Peter Poeml wrote:
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:11:33PM +0100, Christian Boltz wrote:
On a related note: Currently the "wiki" component of product "openSUSE.org" has to be (ab)used for bugs related to the various *.opensuse.org pages. -> Would it make sense to have a separate component in bugzilla also?
Yes, I think it sounds as if it would make sense. I don't have an overview about the components though, I regard myself a mere user of that part of infrastructure, and may miss something.
A somehow related component is "download infrastructure" which I own. It sometimes gets requests that would much better fit a "web pages" component.
Sounds like we should request a component "web pages" for the "opensuse.org" product in bugzilla.
I took the liberty to do this :-) - see bug 469205. You can also comment there if you don't like my proposed description and default contacts.
Regards,
Christian Boltz
On 27.12.2008, at 14:44, Robert Lihm wrote:
Hello,
on Sonntag, 21. Dezember 2008, Christian Boltz wrote:
software.o.o-expert.html -> public/expert.html software.o.o-index.rhtml -> app/views/layouts/application_no_js.rhtml software.o.o-index-unused.rhtml -> app/views/layouts/ application.rhtml (the application*.rhtml are nearly identical - I have no idea why both files are needed)
I even deployed your changes. Thank you! :-)
The "application_no_js.rhtml" is needed, because we don't need the JavaScript libs coming with RoR by default on this page. So we removed them to make the page slimmer and a bit faster. That counts specially in release times ;-)
Have a nice day!
Robet
Robert Lihm, Webdesigner - Build Service Team SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D-90409 Nuernberg Tel: +49-911-74053-0 - rlihm@suse.de ____________________________________________________________ SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) ____________________________________________________________ SUSE - a Novell business
Hello,
(sorry for the late answer, I'm quite busy with $sig in the last weeks)
on Donnerstag, 8. Januar 2009, Robert Lihm wrote:
The "application_no_js.rhtml" is needed, because we don't need the JavaScript libs coming with RoR by default on this page. So we removed them to make the page slimmer and a bit faster. That counts specially in release times ;-)
Does this also mean that the file with JS included (application.rhtml) is not needed? If so, please delete it from SVN to avoid confusion and duplicate work. (Otherwise, please merge the two files and wrap the JS part with an if statement.)
Regards,
Christian Boltz
-
Christian Boltz -
Peter Poeml -
Robert Lihm