Greetings, I'm editing some videos with Kino on suse 10.1 beta. When I try to export to dvd I get an error because (as I read in the shell where I launched Kino): sh: mp2enc not found. Now, if I enter mp2enc in www.rpmfind.net I get a lots of hits showing that mp2enc is part (on Mandriva) of mjpegtools. Since I have that rpm on the SUSE CDs I thought I'd install it. I had no problems to do so, but mp2enc isn't part of that package. Why isn't it there? What is the suse rpm containing mp2enc? TIA, Marco -- Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it Fedora Core 5 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/ ...when most FOSS advocates talk about "freedom" with respect to copyright, patents, content, formats, speech, the press, assembly, etc., etc., they are talking about the freedoms of a privileged elite. comment to "FOSS Community, disabled users must learn to communicate".
On Saturday 29 April 2006 13:41, M. Fioretti wrote:
Greetings,
I'm editing some videos with Kino on suse 10.1 beta. When I try to export to dvd I get an error because (as I read in the shell where I launched Kino):
sh: mp2enc not found.
Now, if I enter mp2enc in www.rpmfind.net I get a lots of hits showing that mp2enc is part (on Mandriva) of mjpegtools. Since I have that rpm on the SUSE CDs I thought I'd install it. I had no problems to do so, but mp2enc isn't part of that package. Why isn't it there? What is the suse rpm containing mp2enc?
That's an easy one: http://rpm.pbone.net/, search for mp2enc (hint: mjpegtools) ;) Cheers, Leen
On Saturday 29 April 2006 13:47, Leendert Meyer wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 13:41, M. Fioretti wrote:
Greetings,
I'm editing some videos with Kino on suse 10.1 beta. When I try to
Hmm, 10.1 beta. Shouldn't this better be asked on the opensuse mailinglist? I thought suse-linux-e was for released versions, and the opensuse ml for pre-released (as in 10.1 beta) versions.
export to dvd I get an error because (as I read in the shell where I launched Kino):
sh: mp2enc not found.
Now, if I enter mp2enc in www.rpmfind.net I get a lots of hits showing that mp2enc is part (on Mandriva) of mjpegtools. Since I have that rpm on the SUSE CDs I thought I'd install it. I had no problems to do so, but mp2enc isn't part of that package. Why isn't it there? What is the suse rpm containing mp2enc?
That's an easy one:
No, it wasn't. I must have read with my eyes closed.
http://rpm.pbone.net/, search for mp2enc
(hint: mjpegtools)
Please disregard Leen
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 13:52:12 PM +0200, Leendert Meyer (leen.meyer@home.nl) wrote:
Hmm, 10.1 beta. Shouldn't this better be asked on the opensuse mailinglist?
Strictly speaking, you're right, but this is not a compiler or similar issue, is it? In other words, I posted here without thinking too much because I am only trying to discover which package contains a certain binary, and I couldn't imagine that in SUSE binaries move, or package contents change, from version to version. Do they?
That's an easy one: No, it wasn't. I must have read with my eyes closed. Please disregard
No problem, really. Anyway, where is this darned binary hidding??? :-) Marco -- Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it Fedora Core 3 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/ The test of success in education...is not what a boy knows after examination on leaving school but what he is doing ten years later. Robert Baden Powell, founder of the Boy Scouts
On Saturday 29 April 2006 13:41, M. Fioretti wrote:
Greetings,
I'm editing some videos with Kino on suse 10.1 beta. When I try to export to dvd I get an error because (as I read in the shell where I launched Kino):
sh: mp2enc not found.
Now, if I enter mp2enc in www.rpmfind.net I get a lots of hits showing that mp2enc is part (on Mandriva) of mjpegtools. Since I have that rpm on the SUSE CDs I thought I'd install it. I had no problems to do so, but mp2enc isn't part of that package. Why isn't it there? What is the suse rpm containing mp2enc?
You have the right rpm name, but the official version doesn't contain certain programs, for various reasons, mostly legal http://packman.links2linux.org/?action=154 has a version of mjpegtools with everything included
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 13:57:52 PM +0200, Anders Johansson (andjoh@rydsbo.net) wrote:
You have the right rpm name, but the official version doesn't contain certain programs, for various reasons, mostly legal
Oh, _that_ kind of problem. I should have imagined it, it's the same on Fedora. Anyway, after using the rpms for both mjpegtools and kino from that site, I'm stuck with a similar problem, that is: error: Failed dependencies: libavcodec.so.51()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libavutil.so.49()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libexpat.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libmp4v2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libxvidcore.so.4()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 and the corresponding packages aren't on that website. Not with a name I recognize at least. Where are they packaged? TIA, Marco -- Marco Fioretti mfioretti, at the server mclink.it Fedora Core 5 for low memory http://www.rule-project.org/ The biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has occurred read on Slashdot
On Saturday 29 April 2006 18:39, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 13:57:52 PM +0200, Anders Johansson
(andjoh@rydsbo.net) wrote:
You have the right rpm name, but the official version doesn't contain certain programs, for various reasons, mostly legal
Oh, _that_ kind of problem. I should have imagined it, it's the same on Fedora. Anyway, after using the rpms for both mjpegtools and kino from that site, I'm stuck with a similar problem, that is:
error: Failed dependencies: libavcodec.so.51()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libavutil.so.49()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
These two are both in libffmpeg0, also available from the packman site
libexpat.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This should be in the expat package, but make sure you're really using the package for your distribution. 10.1 uses libexpat.so.1, I think you have a version of kino meant for an older version of suse
libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This is in the package lame, also on packman
libmp4v2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This is in the package faad2, also on packman
libxvidcore.so.4()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This is in the package xvid, also on packman Make sure you choose the package that's correct for your architecture and version of suse. packman offers packages for many different targets, be sure to select the correct one
Anders Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 29 April 2006 18:39, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 13:57:52 PM +0200, Anders Johansson
(andjoh@rydsbo.net) wrote:
You have the right rpm name, but the official version doesn't contain certain programs, for various reasons, mostly legal
Oh, _that_ kind of problem. I should have imagined it, it's the same on Fedora. Anyway, after using the rpms for both mjpegtools and kino from that site, I'm stuck with a similar problem, that is:
error: Failed dependencies: libavcodec.so.51()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64 libavutil.so.49()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
These two are both in libffmpeg0, also available from the packman site
libexpat.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This should be in the expat package, but make sure you're really using the package for your distribution. 10.1 uses libexpat.so.1, I think you have a version of kino meant for an older version of suse
libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This is in the package lame, also on packman
libmp4v2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This is in the package faad2, also on packman
libxvidcore.so.4()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
This is in the package xvid, also on packman
Make sure you choose the package that's correct for your architecture and version of suse. packman offers packages for many different targets, be sure to select the correct one
From a fellow on this side, I once got a nice line, that tells which packet a program belongs to: rpm -q --whatprovides $(type -p kopete) Is for kopte. -- Med venlig hilsen / Best regards Erik Jakobsen DENMARK
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Saturday 2006-04-29 at 18:54 +0200, Erik Jakobsen wrote:
From a fellow on this side, I once got a nice line, that tells which packet a program belongs to:
rpm -q --whatprovides $(type -p kopete)
Provided you have that package installed. - -- Cheers, Carlos Robinson -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76 iD8DBQFEXgGBtTMYHG2NR9URAjsyAJ41LeTNm5HXTwSahsflUZXNEi0EnQCfSac8 qOqR401cisJuvRMzvgtlVPc= =ixfo -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 4/29/06, M. Fioretti wrote:
error: Failed dependencies: libavcodec.so.51()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
ffmpeg, libffmpeg
libavutil.so.49()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
ffmpeg, libffmpeg
libexpat.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
expat
libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
lame
libmp4v2.so.0()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
libmp4v2
libxvidcore.so.4()(64bit) is needed by kino-0.8.0-1.pm.2.x86_64
xvid Cheers -- -- Svetoslav Milenov (Sunny) Windows is a 32-bit extension to a 16-bit graphical shell for an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor by a 2-bit company that can't stand 1 bit of competition.
participants (6)
-
Anders Johansson -
Carlos E. R. -
Erik Jakobsen -
Leendert Meyer -
M. Fioretti -
Sunny