On 2022-12-21 08:16, Carlos E. R. wrote:

NAT is bad enough, but CGNAT is a disgrace. Any carrier that deploys it, without also providing IPv6 has no respect for it's customers.

They are the majority.

Yet, I get two real IPv4 addresses from my ISP. Also, with their 8 Gb fibre service, they include a 10 Gb switch, and any device plugged directly into the switch gets it's own IPv4 addresses.

Any idea why he.net failed for you? Plenty of people use it, though I haven't. Or is your ISP one of those that provides CGNAT?