Re: [opensuse] Re: [opensuse-factory] broken shasums for 42.2 isos?

21.11.2016 06:13, listreader пишет:

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 21:45:23 -0500 James Knott wrote:

...

On 11/20/2016 09:24 PM, Felix Miata wrote:

...

...

shasum -c openSUSE-Leap-42.2-NET-x86_64.iso.sha256 openSUSE-Leap-42.2-NET-x86_64.iso: OK shasum: WARNING: 14 lines are improperly formatted

Is this expected?

It's not what I expected. I ran into the same thing, but was able to find the correct shasum on the mirror page.

The .sha256 file is PGP signed. Edit it, remove the signature parts (and any trailing blank lines) and you will then have no "improperly formatted" lines. Or, just ignore the format "error" since shasum already said the iso was : OK

Or check both at the same time bor@bor-Latitude-E5450:~/Загрузки$ ( LC_ALL=C LANG=C; gpg --output - openSUSE-Leap-42.2-DVD-x86_64.iso.sha256 | sha256sum -c ) gpg: Signature made Tue Nov 15 20:04:50 2016 MSK using RSA key ID 3DBDC284 gpg: Good signature from "openSUSE Project Signing Key " gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Primary key fingerprint: 22C0 7BA5 3417 8CD0 2EFE 22AA B88B 2FD4 3DBD C284 openSUSE-Leap-42.2-DVD-x86_64.iso: OK -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org