Randall R Schulz wrote:
On Friday 04 July 2008 12:26, John Andersen wrote:
...
Its been my experience that there are fewer bugs in later point releases than in any point Zero release.
Is there really a fundamental, qualitative difference between major and minor release number transitions?
Not that I know of. I think the old .0 rule might be a bit of windoze wisdom, which doesn't really apply to us. For instance, as someone mentioned, suse 10.0 was a minor upgrade from 9.3, while 10.1 contained many changes and unpleasant surprises. Suse 9.0 was another minor update, it could have easily been called "8.3", while 9.1 was a major upgrade, being the first suse release to ship the new 2.6 kernel. I'm sure there are plenty of other examples available, with which to refute the common misconception concerning .0 releases. Joe -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse+help@opensuse.org