On Sun, 2 Mar 2003 19:21:52 +0100 Thorsten Kukuk <kukuk@suse.de> wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, zentara wrote:
Don't confuse libc.so.6 with glibc
??? libc.so.6 is glibc.
Oops, an extra c. IIRC I was refering to the original poster's problem, which said he was getting errors about "glibc" when compiling some gtk2 app. He then referred to libc.so.6 as the possible problem, where it is highly likely the problem was with glib. As in libglib-2.0.so.0.200.0 which is part of the glib package. It's not likely the compiled failed because of libc.so.6, but very likely that it failed because of libglib. But of course, you are right, libc.so.6 is glibc but not glib. It's a distinction which eluded me for quite some time. :-) -- use Perl; #powerful programmable prestidigitation