On 23/10/18 11:46 AM, Paul Groves wrote:
I wonder why there is no standard mount location for secondary filesystems..
There is. There always has been. back in the UNIX V6/V7 days the standard mount point -- this was before the advent of "/home" -- and we had disks of 2.5meg or less like the original RK03 or RK05, the "/usr" was the standard mount point. Until recently and the advent of systemd's demands, for many of us it still was. And of course now we treat "/home" as a standard. I'll leave the nature of the BtrFS "one FS to rule them all" sub-volumes as mount points to the imagination of the user. Sensibly, "/opt" and "/srv" can be though of as candidates for logical mount points. Web site files are something that can be sensibly localized. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse+owner@opensuse.org