From rolf@suse.de Mon Dec 22 10:18:34 1997
From: rolf@suse.de
To: users@lists.opensuse.org
Subject: Re[3]: [S.u.S.E. Linux] 5.1 Upgrade...Excellent!
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 11:18:34 +0100
Message-ID: <67lepq$sdp$1@Galois.fs100.suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <[S.u.S.E. Linux] 5.1 Upgrade...Excellent!>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7369798971545930386=="

--===============7369798971545930386==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable




> I'd settle for just an update of .rpm's to Beta 2 and pick a date
> to make them, with whatever is available at that date. Beta 2 is definetly
> a nice update. Having the susewm options built into the menus of KDE
> is one of the reasons to run S.u.S.E. in my book.

As far as I know you can find the KDE beta2 RPMs in=20
<A HREF=3D"ftp://ftp.suse.com/suse_update/KDE/"><A HREF=3D"ftp://ftp.suse.com=
/suse_update/KDE/</A">ftp://ftp.suse.com/suse_update/KDE/</A</A>>

Looks like susewm has been updated to ist, but the maintainer of this package=
s=20
has already vanished (holidays...).

sincerly,

Rolf Haberrecker

########################################################################
# Rolf Haberrecker, M.A. S.u.S.E. GmbH         fon     +49-911-3247130 # =20
# rolf(a)suse.de           Gebhardtstrasse 2     fax     +49-911-3206727 #
# <A HREF=3D"http://www.suse.de"><A HREF=3D"http://www.suse.de</A">http://www=
.suse.de</A</A>>     90762 Fuerth, Germany mailbox +49-911-3247122 #
########################################################################


--
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo(a)suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e


--===============7369798971545930386==--