From chandlerrick@hotmail.com Thu Nov 12 04:30:15 1998
From: chandlerrick@hotmail.com
To: users@lists.opensuse.org
Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] KDE's KOffice
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:30:15 -0800
Message-ID: <19981112043015.20371.qmail@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <[SuSE Linux] KDE's KOffice>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4987150398982304667=="
--===============4987150398982304667==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>The screenshots are getting more interesting every week.
>
>I'm curious to learn if any of you have installed KOffice under=20
>SuSE5.3? Any problems, like compiling mico 2.2.1, or did you even >need=20
it? Comments or suggestions?
>
>KWord appears to have a lot of potential.....=20
>
>When will KOffice be a viable alternative to SO?? If ever...?
I've installed it under 5.2 with kernel 2.0.34 and couldn't get it to=20
work. I don't think I would install it over SO5 though. I still don't=20
like the idea of running QT libs. Guess why I'm running WindowMaker. =20
You say your Microsoft free? Taken a look at KDE lately? Or even=20
KOffice? No flame intended, just am not impressed with the look of KDE. =20
Great for bringing users over from M$ though.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com>
-
To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
--===============4987150398982304667==--
From mperry@basin.com Thu Nov 12 05:23:26 1998
From: mperry@basin.com
To: users@lists.opensuse.org
Subject: Re[2]: [SuSE Linux] KDE's KOffice
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:23:26 -0800
Message-ID: <3891.981111@basin.com>
In-Reply-To: <19981112043015.20371.qmail@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2360517849215313467=="
--===============2360517849215313467==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wednesday, November 11, 1998, Rick Chandler said:
>>The screenshots are getting more interesting every week.
>>
>>I'm curious to learn if any of you have installed KOffice under
>>SuSE5.3? Any problems, like compiling mico 2.2.1, or did you even >need
> it? Comments or suggestions?
>>
>>KWord appears to have a lot of potential.....
>>
>>When will KOffice be a viable alternative to SO?? If ever...?
> I've installed it under 5.2 with kernel 2.0.34 and couldn't get it to
> work. I don't think I would install it over SO5 though. I still don't
> like the idea of running QT libs. Guess why I'm running WindowMaker.
> You say your Microsoft free? Taken a look at KDE lately? Or even
> KOffice? No flame intended, just am not impressed with the look of KDE.
> Great for bringing users over from M$ though.
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com>
> -
> To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with
> this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
--===============2360517849215313467==--