From chandlerrick@hotmail.com Thu Nov 12 04:30:15 1998 From: chandlerrick@hotmail.com To: users@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re: [SuSE Linux] KDE's KOffice Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 20:30:15 -0800 Message-ID: <19981112043015.20371.qmail@hotmail.com> In-Reply-To: <[SuSE Linux] KDE's KOffice> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============4987150398982304667==" --===============4987150398982304667== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >The screenshots are getting more interesting every week. > >I'm curious to learn if any of you have installed KOffice under=20 >SuSE5.3? Any problems, like compiling mico 2.2.1, or did you even >need=20 it? Comments or suggestions? > >KWord appears to have a lot of potential.....=20 > >When will KOffice be a viable alternative to SO?? If ever...? I've installed it under 5.2 with kernel 2.0.34 and couldn't get it to=20 work. I don't think I would install it over SO5 though. I still don't=20 like the idea of running QT libs. Guess why I'm running WindowMaker. =20 You say your Microsoft free? Taken a look at KDE lately? Or even=20 KOffice? No flame intended, just am not impressed with the look of KDE. =20 Great for bringing users over from M$ though. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com> - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e --===============4987150398982304667==-- From mperry@basin.com Thu Nov 12 05:23:26 1998 From: mperry@basin.com To: users@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re[2]: [SuSE Linux] KDE's KOffice Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 21:23:26 -0800 Message-ID: <3891.981111@basin.com> In-Reply-To: <19981112043015.20371.qmail@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2360517849215313467==" --===============2360517849215313467== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday, November 11, 1998, Rick Chandler said: >>The screenshots are getting more interesting every week. >> >>I'm curious to learn if any of you have installed KOffice under >>SuSE5.3? Any problems, like compiling mico 2.2.1, or did you even >need > it? Comments or suggestions? >> >>KWord appears to have a lot of potential..... >> >>When will KOffice be a viable alternative to SO?? If ever...? > I've installed it under 5.2 with kernel 2.0.34 and couldn't get it to > work. I don't think I would install it over SO5 though. I still don't > like the idea of running QT libs. Guess why I'm running WindowMaker. > You say your Microsoft free? Taken a look at KDE lately? Or even > KOffice? No flame intended, just am not impressed with the look of KDE. > Great for bringing users over from M$ though. > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com> > - > To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with > this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e --===============2360517849215313467==--