From chandlerrick@hotmail.com Tue Jul 28 00:25:43 1998 From: chandlerrick@hotmail.com To: users@lists.opensuse.org Subject: Re: AMD vs Intel (was:Re: [S.u.S.E. Linux] New in 5.3) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 17:25:43 -0700 Message-ID: <19980728002543.22100.qmail@hotmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7192176028532124816==" --===============7192176028532124816== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >> Again I say, I do not want the best performing chip of a given=20 >> clock speed, I want the best performing chip for the price. > >Ben makes an excellent point. Unless you are into 3d gaming, this >argument is meaningless. Linux doesn't demand the fastest cpu to run >well. I've had great experiences with the AMD chip. The K6-2 300 3DNow chip=20 runs 3d stuff great. I run the 233 version and have never had problems=20 running anything and it is a touch faster than my other Intel 233. =20 ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com> - To get out of this list, please send email to majordomo@suse.com with this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e --===============7192176028532124816==--