Given that the maintenance info is out for SLES and the packages are coming in with fou4s and YOU I assume the security announcement for libtiff is pending soon.
The rpms for SuSE 9.2 x86-64 are broken. The libtiff rpm tries to put files in /usr/lib, in conflict with libtiff-32bit - the files should be going into /usr/lib64. I recommend not forcing the updates in, but waiting for the fixed packages from SuSE - which I assume are on their way? Lots of stuff may otherwise be broken...
Bjørn
Hi,
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:17:55PM +0200, Bjorn Tore Sund wrote:
Given that the maintenance info is out for SLES and the packages are coming in with fou4s and YOU I assume the security announcement for libtiff is pending soon.
The rpms for SuSE 9.2 x86-64 are broken. The libtiff rpm tries to put files in /usr/lib, in conflict with libtiff-32bit - the files should be going into /usr/lib64. I recommend not forcing the updates in, but waiting for the fixed packages from SuSE - which I assume are on their way? Lots of stuff may otherwise be broken...
Thanks for the hint.
I forwarded it to our maintainer and if needed we will release a new update.
The rpms for SuSE 9.2 x86-64 are broken. The libtiff rpm tries to put files in /usr/lib, in conflict with libtiff-32bit - the files should be going into /usr/lib64. I recommend not forcing the updates in, but waiting for the fixed packages from SuSE - which I assume are on their way? Lots of stuff may otherwise be broken...
Thanks for the hint.
I forwarded it to our maintainer and if needed we will release a new update.
The file/directory layout of the package wasn't changed.
fou4s version prior 0.13.0 (released last weeek) had problems with the biarch support. To track this issue down have a look at: /var/log/fou4s.log
On Fri, 27 May 2005, Thomas Biege wrote:
The rpms for SuSE 9.2 x86-64 are broken. The libtiff rpm tries to put files in /usr/lib, in conflict with libtiff-32bit - the files should be going into /usr/lib64. I recommend not forcing the updates in, but waiting for the fixed packages from SuSE - which I assume are on their way? Lots of stuff may otherwise be broken...
Thanks for the hint.
I forwarded it to our maintainer and if needed we will release a new update.
The file/directory layout of the package wasn't changed.
fou4s version prior 0.13.0 (released last weeek) had problems with the biarch support. To track this issue down have a look at: /var/log/fou4s.log
Thanks - sorry for putting the blame where it didn't belong. And it still crashes with fou4s 0.13.0-1. But at least then I know that issuing manual updates on that package is safe.
Bjørn
-
Bjorn Tore Sund -
Thomas Biege