it is ok .... i think.
I control so :
cristian:/var/run # pgrep clamd
8924
cristian:/var/run # ps -aef | grep clam
vscan 8924 1 0 16:39 ? 00:00:00 clamd
root 9182 6965 0 17:38 pts/38 00:00:00 grep clam
Thanks,
On Jul 01, 2004 05:33 PM, Gilles Chung <gchung(a)aew.com> wrote:
> Ok, what about clamd? Is it running?
> And another question what is the user running clam daemon??
>
> Regards
> Gilles
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cristian Del Carlo [mailto:delcarlo@osratoscana.it]
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:22 AM
> To: Gilles Chung
> Cc: suse-security(a)suse.com
> Subject: RE: [suse-security] postfix - amavisd-new - clamav
>
> No ,
> becouse if i run the netstat command i have :
>
> cristian:/var/run # netstat -ntap
> Active Internet connections (servers and established)
> Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:10024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8974/amavisd (maste
> tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:10025 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8661/master
>
> And if i use telnet i have the connection :
>
> cristian:/var/run # telnet localhost 10024
> Trying 127.0.0.1...
> Connected to localhost.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> 220 [127.0.0.1] ESMTP amavisd-new service ready
>
>
> On Jul 01, 2004 05:10 PM, Gilles Chung <gchung(a)aew.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > Could it be amavisd not running??
> > It seems you cannot connect to localhost via 10024
> >
> > Jul 1 16:46:43 localhost postfix/smtp[9016]: connect to localhost[::1]:
> > Connection refused (port 10024)
> > Jul 1 16:46:45 localhost amavis[8976]: (08976-01) ESMTP::10024
> > /var/spool/amavis/amavis-20040701T164644
> > -08976: <cristian2(a)cristian.lucca.osratoscana.it> ->
> > <cristian.delcarlo(a)osratoscana.it> Received: SIZE=1
> >
> > Gilles
> >
>
>
>
> Cristian Del Carlo
> delcarlo(a)osratoscana.it
> Tel. 0583 424700
> Fax 0583 424750
> http://www.osratoscana.it
>
> Il testo e gli eventuali documenti trasmessi contengono informazioni riservate al destinatario indicato. La seguente e-mail è confidenziale e la sua riservatezza è tutelata legalmente dal Decreto Legislativo 196 del 30/06/2003 (Codice di tutela della privacy). La lettura, copia o altro uso non autorizzato o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere, immediatamente, alla sua distruzione.
>
>
Cristian Del Carlo
delcarlo(a)osratoscana.it
Tel. 0583 424700
Fax 0583 424750
http://www.osratoscana.it
Il testo e gli eventuali documenti trasmessi contengono informazioni riservate al destinatario indicato. La seguente e-mail è confidenziale e la sua riservatezza è tutelata legalmente dal Decreto Legislativo 196 del 30/06/2003 (Codice di tutela della privacy). La lettura, copia o altro uso non autorizzato o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere, immediatamente, alla sua distruzione.
Hello,
i know about the patch.
This patch only helps, if qmail is used as server.
I use qmail as relay and virus-protection.
The unwonted mails came from our own Exchange-Server.
Because he wants to tell the (not existing) sender about a not existing
emailadress.
CU
Robert
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: Theo v. Werkhoven [mailto:twe-suse.sec@ferrets4me.xs4all.nl]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Juli 2004 23:18
An: suse-security(a)suse.com
Betreff: Re: [suse-security] Filter out bad emails
On Thu, 01 Jul 2004, Rasp, made the net somewhat safer by saying:
> Hello,
>
> i use qmail with spamassassin and qmail-scanner.
> As you all know, most of the spamers generate emailadresse by them
mself and try to deliver ther sh** to the "new recepient".
>
> The LINUX-Box is only our relay. In the back is a Exchange-Server
working.
> The EX-Server trys to answers to the non existent mailadress of the
spammer.
> Spamassassin has already markted this mails as spam.
> How can i use MAILDROP (or someting else) to kill this mails.
Qmail can be patched to reject unknown recipients.
Postfix or Sendmail or Exim don't need patching, and do this
of-the-shelve.
Theo
--
Theo v. Werkhoven Registered Linux user# 99872 http://counter.li.org
ICBM 52 13 27N , 4 29 45E. + ICQ: 277217131
SUSE 9.1 + Jabber: gurp(a)nedlinux.nl
Kernel k_athlon-2.6.4 + MSN: twe-msn(a)ferrets4me.xs4all.nl
See headers for PGP/GPG info. +
No ,
becouse if i run the netstat command i have :
cristian:/var/run # netstat -ntap
Active Internet connections (servers and established)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:10024 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8974/amavisd (maste
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:10025 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 8661/master
And if i use telnet i have the connection :
cristian:/var/run # telnet localhost 10024
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 [127.0.0.1] ESMTP amavisd-new service ready
On Jul 01, 2004 05:10 PM, Gilles Chung <gchung(a)aew.com> wrote:
> Hi
> Could it be amavisd not running??
> It seems you cannot connect to localhost via 10024
>
> Jul 1 16:46:43 localhost postfix/smtp[9016]: connect to localhost[::1]:
> Connection refused (port 10024)
> Jul 1 16:46:45 localhost amavis[8976]: (08976-01) ESMTP::10024
> /var/spool/amavis/amavis-20040701T164644
> -08976: <cristian2(a)cristian.lucca.osratoscana.it> ->
> <cristian.delcarlo(a)osratoscana.it> Received: SIZE=1
>
> Gilles
>
Cristian Del Carlo
delcarlo(a)osratoscana.it
Tel. 0583 424700
Fax 0583 424750
http://www.osratoscana.it
Il testo e gli eventuali documenti trasmessi contengono informazioni riservate al destinatario indicato. La seguente e-mail è confidenziale e la sua riservatezza è tutelata legalmente dal Decreto Legislativo 196 del 30/06/2003 (Codice di tutela della privacy). La lettura, copia o altro uso non autorizzato o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere, immediatamente, alla sua distruzione.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I got not less than 5 autoresponses from vacation type programs for a
single message I posted to this list, on the "Execute a SSH command"
thread. Is that the normal behaviour normal here?
I don't understand how people interested on security can be so careless
with autoresponders :-/ :-O
These are the culprits - I name them so that they can know what is
happening, if they really read the list:
1) t.foecking#kreis-borken.de
robin1.listas#tiscali.es
betreff Mailer Dämon - Unknown User
Die Nachricht an t.foecking#kreis-borken.de konnte nicht zugestellt werden. Der Empfänger ist hier unbekannt.
(I know no german, so I have no idea what they are telling me)
2) ig-relacionamento#ig.com.br
Caro(a) cliente,
Agradecemos sua mensagem e continuamos trabalhando para oferecer um
atendimento cada vez melhor.
(I'm not their client!)
3) postmaster#mavari.be
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)+AFs-Scanned+AF0-
Message, "Re: [suse-security] Execute a SSH command[Scanned]"
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
postmaster#mavari.be
(a postmaster on the list, as such "postmaster"?)
4) From: suporte#hpg.com.br
Subject: Re: Re: [suse-security] Execute a SSH command
Olá,
Recebemos seu email e logo entraremos em contato via e-mail. Por favor,
aguarde.
(another one confusing me for a customer, I guess - I know no
portuguese)
5) From: Stefan Orth <SORTH#de.ibm.com>
Subject: Stefan Orth/Germany/IBM is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 26.06.2004 and will not return until04.07.2004.
- --
Cheers,
Carlos Robinson
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFA40gQtTMYHG2NR9URAu1QAJ9raU5SykhtKTS6V1Lwoz6gix39SwCdEP3w
3P35IB0BF1MM81GXAXiAw0U=
=xtjc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hello,
i use qmail with spamassassin and qmail-scanner.
As you all know, most of the spamers generate emailadresse by them mself and try to deliver ther sh** to the "new recepient".
The LINUX-Box is only our relay. In the back is a Exchange-Server working.
The EX-Server trys to answers to the non existent mailadress of the spammer.
Spamassassin has already markted this mails as spam.
How can i use MAILDROP (or someting else) to kill this mails.
Because this mails make my queue on the qmail-Server grow and grow ...
Its not allowed to me to drop all mails marked as spam. But its allowed to drop
mails, marked as spam which are send from our own Postmaster.
thanks for your Help
Robert Rasp
Hello
I have postfix with amavis as mail server. I have received an email that
amavis has rejected and send me an email with this information
The message has been quarantined as:
/var/spool/amavis/virusmails/virus-20040701-160935-20728-10
Now I want to get this message, How I can do that?
Thanks
Emiliano Sutil
Hello,
I found a normal file in /dev: "h" on one of my servers:
# ls -al /dev/h
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 446 Feb 19 14:17 /dev/h
It contains the following text between binary code:
Invalid partition table^@No operating system^@Error loading operating system
Is this from a rootkit or normal to SuSE 9.0?
Thank you for an answer.
Manfred
...you mean "experimental on 2.6.x kernel"
OK, but switching back is not as easy (for me)
as ist sounds ( firewall etc)
anyway...... i NEVER put a root on a RAID.
I reinstalled the same box, just leaving / on a normal
partition (ext3) and all works fine..... and hoping the harddisk wont fail
until my backup is done !
...a frustrated Linux User !
> Raid is kind a experimental on 2.4.x kernels, better chose 2.4.x kernel.
>
> Uninstall kernel 2.6.x, then install kernel 2.4.x (x means latest one).
Then
> start lilo or change settings within grub.
>
> Afterwards reboot - not before the installation of kernel 2.4.x (otherwise
> you cannot load any kernelmodules and that would be not funny)!!!
>
> Philippe
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Werner Penz" <dev.penz(a)tirol.com>
> To: <suse-security(a)suse.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 5:21 PM
> Subject: [suse-security] Waiting for device /dev/900 to appear
>
>
> > OK, id did a complete new installation (same box)
> > with the same disk-configuration:
> >
> > /dev/hda2 + /dev/hdb2 als raid1: /dev/md0 = / #root (ext3)
> > /dev/hda1 = /boot
> >
> > from original CD SuSe 91prof.
> > minimal System installed.
> >
> > all works fine until i upgrade the kernel 2.6.4 to 2.6.5 from
> > the ftp.suse.com with YOU.
> >
> > The boot aborts with:
> >
> > raidautorun
> > ...
> > waiting for device /dev/900 to appear ...(short delay ) .... not
found....
> >
> >
> > RAIDs never saved me from a "dilemma",
> > for me, the always created one !
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Check the headers for your unsubscription address
> > For additional commands, e-mail: suse-security-help(a)suse.com
> > Security-related bug reports go to security(a)suse.de, not here
> >
>
>
>