On Mittwoch, 30. Mai 2018 11:54:52 CEST Ludwig Nussel wrote: Hi Ludwig,
Leap has no dedicated maintainers. It's all inherited from Factory and the output of "osc maintainer" counts, rather than any personal interpretation of the data.
"osc maintainer" outputs very different information than your email for most of the cases in the original list, example (randomly picked): $ osc maintainer rpmdevtools Defined in package: devel:tools/rpmdevtools bugowner of rpmdevtools : jnweiger, toganm maintainer of rpmdevtools : - still I was listed as maintainer in your email . The bugowner is explicitely set here, and the wiki page (not my personal interpretation) says: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Package_maintainership_guide Package/Project bugowner You inheritingly are the guy everyone reports issues to, the only difference compared to the maintainer is that you don't have direct write access to the project/package you are set as bugowner to. Plus the page doesn't mention anything about Leap, and leap seems to have more complicated rules (for packages that comre from SLE). is there any way to understand which information is actually correct? how does "osc maintainer" look that up?
The notification mail did not refer to maintenance and security updates at all. It just asked to review the packages you are responsible for to check whether everything is correct in Leap. Taking acct as example again, if Katarina is the actual package maintainer then don't add yourself as maintainer also. You are project maintainer so can and have to act as backup anyways. Any notifications, bot reviews etc would always go to an explicitly set maintainer if there is one.
maintainer or bugowner in that last sentence?
what am I missing? I've reread your email now twice, and I'm jetlagging.. Get some sleep before harassing people then.
Successfully completed sleep step :-) Thanks, Dirk
cu Ludwig
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-releaseteam+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-releaseteam+owner@opensuse.org