To bring the whole voting process in line with Board voting I would also propose that 20% of membership is required to replace foundation or change aspects of it. Which is nonsense. As I see it, we as a Project need input from at least majority of members in such major and important topics. This is deciding future. You can't put it in hands of 20%. Add "I abstain", "I don't care" or something similar to get neutral input in voting but I think Project need to hear "something" from membership. If such voting is binding from 20% because we fear that not many more Members will even care to vote then why even bother with setting this artificial border - just accept any voting result. peace, Patryk Zera -------------------------------------------- 6.6.19 (Czw), Simon Lees <sflees@suse.de> napisał(a): Temat: Re: [opensuse-project] Proposal for Decision Making Process for the formation of our Foundation Do: opensuse-project@opensuse.org Data: 6 Czerwiec 2019 (Czwartek), 23:30 On 07/06/2019 06:44, Simon Lees wrote:

- 25% of the

binding, any vote under 25% shall be

having a strong opinion and it shall be upto the board to determine

membership must vote in a ballot before it is considered treated as the membership not the

best resolution for the issue.

Upon further thought i'm going to change the 25% to 20% to bring it in line with the number of members required to replace the board Cheers -- Simon Lees (Simotek)                            http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team                          keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux                          Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org