On 11/26/20 1:34 AM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Vincent Untz
[11-25-20 04:45]: Le mercredi 25 novembre 2020 à 17:24 +0800, Ariez Vachha a écrit :
So there is definitely some thinking to be done. I personally like Simon's idea but would prefer rather than a fixed number like 10 we express it as a percentage of the membership. Taking approximately 500 members then 20% = 100 and 10 = 2%. I would feel 3 to 4% would be a better indication of real support.
FWIW, I believe that anything expressed as a percentage (including the 20% rule that we already have) is broken right now as, to my knowledge, inactive members are still counted in the total members, while they will not vote. We should only consider a list of active members for such percentages.
a strict definition of "active" vs "inactive" is necessary.
The current definition of active is anyone on the membership list, in the past we have used other methods to clean up the membership list. In my opinion its probably better to address cleaning up the membership list separately as we have in the past. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B