A different, but IMHO equally valid, option that comes to mind, would be that the Board does not make any decisions at all ( we could hold back info from the minutes, have unverifiable votings and so on ), but instead pushes all decision making to the public area and ask the community to decide by public, named vote on any decision. That would require volunteers to set up a voting procedure on each decision to be made, have other volunteers check the voting setup etc. , an independent secretary that does the minute-taking, an independent minutes checking official, but if that's the desired way of making decisions, finding those people shouldn't be that hard.
Counter proposal - as I have written twice now, let's skip board elections altogether, just have a rotating membership. The Chairman is appointed, but every other member is picked automatically from the community roster and asked to be a board member for 12 months. Anyone can decline of course, and the next one will be asked.