Le 25/08/2010 15:54, Andreas Jaeger a écrit :
New rule: Appointment: In case that board seats will get appointed, they get appointed by the board.
what do you mean by "appointment"? in french this translate by "rendez-vous"?
If I guess from the whole post, you mean "designate". The board (what board?) should designate some of the board members? and if you have only one remaining board memember, this one will designate all the others?
designations, or cooptation can be accepted on large groups, for a small number of people and a small time period, but on a five member group... I guess no
you should rewrite your proposition (sorry) by rewriting and publishing the whole rules. I can't really understand how your proposal cope with the present rules.
just some thought:
* if ever we don't have enough candidates, that mean to position is not attractive and some important things have to be rethinked (no patch will do any good)
* it's very frequent to have the same number of candidates than places, because most candidate are not really wanting the duty but simply wanting to help and give easily they voice to an other people. This is not necerrely bad.
* a yes/no vote don't make any good: what do you do if evry body have all yes or all no?