On Wednesday 17 October 2007 12:54:54 pm Martin Lasarsch wrote:
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 19:44:07 Rajko M. wrote: <snip>
Though, IMHO SDB should not be edited at will. It has to be dependable source of information, it should be protected.
Everyone has enough space on wiki to write articles, and when they are good quality and fit in the SDB concept, than it is easy to include them in SDB.
i'm not agreeing with that, i don't want to protect stuff. But yes, this could be an option (actually i'm not sure if you can protect the whole namespace ... dunno).
Yet another Server (YaS) if no other options are left :-) Proposal to protect articles is based on importance to have one dependable source of information how to solve existing problem, that is reviewed by guys that know how certain subsystem is working. We can have article with the same name in a Main namespace, open for editing, and whoever would be SDB maintainer can incorporate changes in SDB. -- Regards, Rajko. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org