Le 03/10/2015 15:26, Carlos E. R. a écrit :
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
On 2015-10-03 14:56, Robert Schweikert wrote:
With the exception that you cannot differentiate between the people that are active and do not vote and those that are inactive and do not vote. Thus it is pretty much impossible to "care about the active" people and try to understand why the choose not to vote. That is also an important part about caring for the active people, at least from my perspective.
I think the worry is about inactive members that do vote ;-)
and useful and very easy way to make the problem of less importance would be to add an "abstention" vote. People wanting to vote, but not liking the content can express. but this do not change the essential question: is voting once in a while enough to be considered as a contributor? problem is the "contributor" criteria is very difficult to define (for example is somebody that only ask questions on a list a contributor? the answer is not as easy as you may think, because asking question is a good way to keep alive a list and good question can lead to good answer That said, I don't think we should take all this too serious. I don't see real present reason that could make a "coup" (coup d'état) could happen on openSUSE. jdd -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner@opensuse.org