Hi Cristian :) Whoever uses the deal as an explanation for something should first look at what happened with come criticism. The deal in itself is a very standard form of cooperation between companies with similar interests. The noise was not caused by Novell and by Microsoft, but by the Linux community itself. The same Linux community that, on one hand claims to be open minded, but on the other hand is unable to accept this kind of cooperation. They might like MS or not, but they should judge on what the deal lead to, and not on opinions and potential risks. I think It did not happen, in part because many did not understand the terms of the deal, and in part because someone in the community used it as to support his own ideas and goals. If there is any damage caused by the deal to Linux, and I still have to see where this damage is, I would start looking for the responsible in the community, beginning with those that made a lot to disparage who is actually trying to work and do something to improve Linux for its users. Just my two cents, of course :) Best, A. 2010/6/8 Cristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>:
El 08/06/10 14:06, Alberto Passalacqua escribió:
Which clearly is a point you are misusing to support your ideas.
got the point Alberto, it is a a "fallacy of irrelevance". -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org
-- Alberto Passalacqua -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org