Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. Januar 2020 um 16:32 Uhr
Von: "Richard Brown" <rbrown(a)suse.de>
Betreff: Re: [opensuse-project] openSUSE Board election 2019-2020 - Final candidates
You have misunderstood a lot of my answers.
I feel there are a number of factual inaccuracies and tonal concerns I
wish to raise with your answers
Where are the concerns? You are the first one who has responded.
That is a mailing list and I am open for discussions.
was asked really often at open source events how
another company can sponsor openSUSE. We had to say that it would not
possible because all of our money is going via a SUSE credit card and
the money would be lost (same with the GSoC money, which has to be
transferred to other organizations because of this issue). No company
wants to pay Open Source Developers with such a background of an
open-source project. Therefore, most openSUSE Contributors are
working for SUSE or SUSE Business Partners. This topic popped up more
than 3 times during my last Board Membership (really created by SUSE
employees each time!).
There are a number of other ways besides money that other companies and
projects can, do, and have sponsored openSUSE.
Yes. But that all has the issue that we don't have a foundation.
We had supperior offers for hardware sponsorships and they had been canceled because
"SUSE Linux GmbH" is listed as a co-contractor. Such companies would accept a
Another case is the sponsorship for openSUSE Conferences. I have organized a German
organization in the past. There were a lot of problems to receive information about
before. We sponsored the food then. But during a meeting this year, I heared that our
does not want to support openSUSE any more because of these problems. You can watch the
the last conference. Do you want to have only sandwiches for guests at the conference?
The topic "paied Open Source Developers" is coming from a study conference of
the SBB foundation.
A speaker told about "New Work" and that it is modern to offer 20% of working
time for non-profit
projects. I know different IT companies who want to support open-source projects on this
Do you mean, they want to give us these Developers without being allowed to publish the
logo on the homepage? What is the requirement for doing that? They have to be a sponsor,
I disagree with the implication in the above that
openSUSE is not able
to recieve any such sponsorship.
My experience at openSUSE shows the opposite.
Obviously I agree that direct monetary sponsorship is
problematic, but given openSUSE is rarely short of money for the
activities we do, I do not think it's the highest priority for the
Project at this time.
Solution: Creation of the foundation! I had to
suggest this solution
more than 3 times before that was accepted by SUSE employees in the
Board. I told about all the benefits how we can manage our own money
then, receive new sponsors, SUSE can use more money for their own,
SUSE can sponsor us continuously and we would be able to receive more
The idea of an openSUSE Foundation has been a recurring topic for the
openSUSE Project since before 2011.
I outright reject the statement that you "had to suggest this solution
more than 3 times that was was accepted by SUSE employees in the
We had long discussions about resolving the problem with the money.
Google Summer of Code and openSUSE Asia Summit are only examples of our
Board Meetings. Every time, I have repeated the suggestion with the foundation
with all benefits for us and SUSE. I have experience with foundations from my
student life and one employer who wanted to safe his open-source project with that.
After 1.5 hours discussions without any predictable end (topic openSUSE Asia Summit
in the past) all the other Board Members agreed that this would be the only
possible solution. We can use the time for other topics in the future.
There is no difference between the Board members who
elected by the community, and I think it is inappropirate for a
potential Board member of to express a "them vs us" outlook between
those elected Board members employed by a certain company and those who
Yes. That is right. There is no difference in the Board. But it was peculiar
that all the time SUSE employees were complaining about money topics at the
openSUSE Board. The shortest way is another one.
infrastructure in Provo
Background: I am one of the Founders of the openSUSE Heroes Team and
was allowed to coordinate our first wiki project between Germany and
Provo. The openSUSE infrastructure is in Microfocus hands and they
need very long to respond on issues and we are not allowed to receive
access as a community. Additionally, SUSE is not part of Microfocus
any more which makes it more difficult to receive good support in the
Solution 1: Migration of all openSUSE systems from Provo to Nuremberg
/ Prague (perhaps missing space?)
Solution 2: Migration of all openSUSE systems from Provo to any
German hosting data centre with access for openSUSE Heroes
It is my personal and professional experience that issues I report to
admin(a)opensuse.org are no more likely to be resolved if they relate to
openSUSE infrastructure in Nuremberg than if they related to openSUSE
infrastructure in Provo.
Really? We are waiting for a database dump for our forums since September.
A one line fix for the broken rss feed needed 2 months.
In my experience our Heroes Team interacts mostly faster.
openSUSE also recently experienced a prolonged outage
of one piece
infrastructure hosted by a German hosting data centre with access for
Since somebody joined the Heroes again, infrastructure topics from
Germany have been resolved faster. That counts for hosted at SUSE and
in the data centre.
Therefore I disagree that moving anything from Provo
to Nuremberg or
anywhere else is mandatory or necessarily helpful in order to fix
Do you prefer a non working infrastructure? The Heroes Team is giving all.
But that is not possible with MF-IT.
I agree that openSUSE needs to have vastly improved
support of its
infrastructure, but I do not think the Board should be demanding the
details of what steps should be taken to reach that solution.
I strongly feel the details should be left to the volunteers and
sponsors who will be responsible for providing that support.
That is necessary if you want to keep that in Provo. Admins don't work
there without escalations. Our new Chairman had to ask for a database
dump. I prefer such topics as Heroes topics, too. MF-IT does not listen
to our Heroes Team. Therefore, we need escalations via the Chairman or
another place for the infrastructure.
reputation of openSUSE Leap & openSUSE Tumbleweed
Background: We are the openSUSE project with many different sub-
projects. We don’t offer only Linux distributions, but we are well
known for that and most people are associating us with that. I had
given many presentations about openSUSE during my last Board
Membership and represented us at different open source events. The
existing openSUSE Board does not do that very much. They have another
focus at the moment.
Solution: We need more openSUSE Contributors representing openSUSE
and I can do that as an openSUSE Board Member again. After that, we
can be one of the top Linux distributions again. 😉
I disagree that you need to be a Board member in order to represent
openSUSE and I dislike the implication that those two roles are somehow
You are writing what I have written as a solution...
I wrote that we need more openSUSE Contributors there. It is not necessary
to be a Board Member to represent openSUSE. It is welcome to see openSUSE
Board Members at open-source events. That is giving openSUSE an higher value there then.
I think it would be a much better to encorage that
anyone can, and
should, represent openSUSE regardless of their status in the Project.
One role does not suspend the other one. Read my solution correctly.
3. What should the board do differently / more of?
The existing openSUSE Board is working mostly on the topic with the
foundation. That is good. Thank you! But the role of a Board Member
contains the representation of the community, too. We would have one
less risk with that.
As I state above, I agree the Project needs more ambassadors,
advocates, and cheerleaders but I think the representation of openSUSE
can and should be handled by anyone in the Project.
You are elected as a openSUSE Board Member because you are representing
the openSUSE Community. We have the name "Student Representative" for
elected Students at our university. We have been electing Board Members.
Our focus should be to resolve problems. But we are representing the community, too.
Additionally, I am not only one candidate with this idea. ;)
I'd rather see Board members spend their time on
tasks requiring the
trust and responsibility vested in them by the electorate.
I hope my fellow voters elect people based on their ability to handle
tasks the community could not otherwise easily solve themselves.
Which additional (missing) tasks do you see?
One role does not exclude others. I did not decline to resolve issues.
I can resolve problems as a Computer Scientist (not only technical things).
Linux Distribution Engineer - Future Technology Team
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org