On 05/04/2015 11:52 PM, Luiz Fernando Ranghetti wrote:
2015-05-04 15:56 GMT-03:00 oldcpu
From the view of one of the openSUSE forum
moderators (and the other
moderators may have a different view, as this is my private view wrt giving
support) I am not particularly keen on seeing a kernel that is too old with
openSUSE. Again , this comes from a forum support viewpoint.
Would applying a Tumbleweed kernel be the only way to address such an older
kernel concern ?
No, probably just add the Kernel:Stable to that install, just like nowadays.
OK. Good to know of the alternative.
That raises some support implementation questions in my mind.
From a support perspective, I assume that any user who needed to do
such (because the openSUSE/SLE common kernel did not support their newer
hardware) would then be compelled to custom build their graphic driver
(if using a higher performance proprietary driver) and their virtual box
(if using the proprietary virtual box) . I doubt there would be rpms of
proprietary drivers packaged for Kernel:Stable. Fortunate opensource
drivers are better today than in the past (case in point - wireless) but
I suspect installing one's proprietary graphic driver "the hardway" or
rebuilding proprietary virtual box (with "/etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup" or
possibly building the binary) could be a challenge to some new openSUSE
users ... Which makes me think if a common kernel approach is adopted,
we may want a new wiki / guide for such users (ie how to maintain one's
"Kernel:Stable" ) ... and possibly the "Kernel:Stable" may need
further than what it gets now ? < unsure > .
Would "Kernel:Stable" nominally get the same security fixes that the
regular openSUSE/SLE kernel gets ? Would it get the same bugzilla
support if a bug encountered ?
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, email: opensuse-project+owner(a)opensuse.org