On 2021/04/02 08:24, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> The wording of the statement seems to suggest that's exactly what's
> being considered. I assume this is about RMS?
Something to note. A recent "/." article mentioned
2 letters, one asking for removal, another against.
The signatures against were about 3000+, and 'for' was about
No idea if it is valid, however, since no allegations of
fraud have been raised at this point, it will be interesting
to see how, this power-play evolves with what seems to
be a much more vocal minority.
Hoping people are condemning the improper statements and
actions and not the person(s) (or personality/ies) involved.
I'm not sure where I stand on this issue -- primarily because
of what feels like a lynchmob mentality. He may deserve ouster,
but mob-rule is not a pretty thing -- its sorta scarey.