On 2021/04/02 08:24, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
The wording of the statement seems to suggest that's exactly what's being considered. I assume this is about RMS?
---- Something to note. A recent "/." article mentioned 2 letters, one asking for removal, another against. The signatures against were about 3000+, and 'for' was about 2000+. No idea if it is valid, however, since no allegations of fraud have been raised at this point, it will be interesting to see how, this power-play evolves with what seems to be a much more vocal minority. Hoping people are condemning the improper statements and actions and not the person(s) (or personality/ies) involved. I'm not sure where I stand on this issue -- primarily because of what feels like a lynchmob mentality. He may deserve ouster, but mob-rule is not a pretty thing -- its sorta scarey.