On Tuesday 2010-08-10 13:39, Martin Schlander wrote:
Tirsdag den 10. august 2010 09:32:56 skrev Andreas Jaeger:
Today we continue with public discussions about strategy proposals, this time with the "Status quo" strategy proposal:
There's a lot to like about it - if you don't think so, what are you doing here? ;-)
But I have a couple of gripes with it.
It's not easy to sum up with one or two sentences or a couple of keywords to answer the question "Why openSUSE?"
http://news.opensuse.org/2009/04/23/people-of-opensuse-jan-engelhardt/ could add a pointer to that question.
which I consider a requirement for the strategy - like e.g. Debian (stable, old, server), Fedora (innovation, bleeding edge, open source), Ubuntu (newbie, bad python code, more newbie).
You forgot to add: Ubuntu (quite-forking GNOME and its implications, see more on LWN)
It doesn't clearly identify an audience to (mainly) focus on.
q = !fedora_stuntmen && !ubuntu_newb; As it happens, this also seems to evaluate for Debian users (*handwave*). -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org