Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 21 juin 2010, à 14:28 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
As for the "unseen panel of judges", there's a team of people (membership officials). We should indeed have some page about them.
Thanks to Pavol, we now have http://wiki.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Membership_officials_team
now, THAT is what i call *real* progress towards transparency.. thank you Vincent and Pavol!! but, i'm not certain the deliberations should be closed...kinda smacks of secret police, dark corner cliques, and such... note: if people didn't talk about me i would *not* be paranoid :-) is there an established guideline on what are the minimum level of contributions, or what? is there a review or appeal process if an applicant is rejected? what is the rate of rejection? i ask because someone earlier (here or elsewhere) said there were now ~400 members and, i wonder why so few! huge rejection rate or gigantic apathy?? i mean there must 100,000+++ openSUSE users, at least...if only 400 are members/contributors i think we have a problem much larger than just not having a clear strategy for the future.. maybe we need to change one of the existing Community Statements to: Increase contributor visibility and encourage each to become official openSUSE Community Members though ... (increasing benefits or ???) DenverD -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org