Hi, Le jeudi 20 mai 2010, à 17:25 +0200, Pavol Rusnak a écrit :
After much discussion, we're finally ready to bring together these important bits of information into a cohesive statement that everyone can unify around. As such, we, the members of the Strategy Team, will be meeting in Nuremberg the weekend of May 28th to formalize a draft of our strategy that will be available publicly for open discussion and comment.
First, I'm really glad to see this happening: it's something that was very much needed, and I certainly have high expectations now :-) Do you have an idea how the discussion and comments around the draft will be handled? I just want to be sure we know how we'll process them before we get them -- for example, what happens if we get some strong "I disagree" comments? Of course, I'd love to read the non-formalized draft, but that just me being curious ;-) It's good to have a small group come with a proposal as a first step. [...]
For more information about our work, please feel free to review our documents at http://en.opensuse.org/Documents. And we'll be sure to keep you informed of our progress results from this exciting retreat.
Should we feel free to edit those documents? Or should we send feedback by mail, on IRC, etc.? I'd probably need to read everything a second time (first read was definitely interesting), but one thing that looked completely wrong/off-topic was this line in SWOT about "Novell - openSUSE relationship" W: freedesktop.org is a complete failure, LSB is a dead horse, lack of will, too much corporation, etc. What's the link between fd.o or LSB and Novell or openSUSE? Thanks, Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-project+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-project+help@opensuse.org