There's another thing i'd like to ask/point out about mkudffs...
when formatted in Linux with UDF revision 1.5, a windows machine with .....
is not able to read the disc. I used the udf-verifier to compare the disc
formatted with the windoze machine vs the Linux machine, and got this:
windoze machine :
====> Encountered EntityID summary :
count EntityID
3 Domain Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*OSTA UDF Compliant"
UDF revision : 1.50
Domain flags : #00
2 UDF Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*UDF LV Info"
UDF revision : 1.50
OS Class : #05 Windows 9x
OS Identifier : #00 Windows 9x - Generic
2 UDF Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*UDF Sparable Partition"
UDF revision : 1.50
OS Class : #05 Windows 9x
OS Identifier : #00 Windows 9x - Generic
2 UDF Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*UDF Sparing Table"
UDF revision : 1.50
OS Class : #05 Windows 9x
OS Identifier : #00 Windows 9x - Generic
12 Implementation Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*Veritas CPG file syste"
OS Class : #05 Windows 9x
OS Identifier : #00 Windows 9x - Generic
2 Application Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*Veritas CPG file syste"
Implementation Use : #05 #00 #00 #00 #00 #00 #00 #00
2 Application Entity Identifier
Identifier : "+NSR02"
Implementation Use : #50 #01 #05 #00 #00 #00 #00 #00
These EntityIDs are also shown above when read for the first time
====> Final verify status report
Final UDF Revision range: 1.50 only
File System info
last valid block : 197951
block size : 2048
packet length : 16
nmb of sessions : 1
verify session : 1
session starts : 0
medium WR type : rewritable
medium SE type : nonsequential
Error count: 7 total occurrences: 14
Warning count: 1 total occurrences: 2
on the mkudffs formatted disc, i got this :
====> Encountered EntityID summary :
count EntityID
2 Domain Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*OSTA UDF Compliant"
UDF revision : 1.50
Domain flags : #00
1 UDF Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*UDF LV Info"
UDF revision : 1.50
OS Class : #04 UNIX
OS Identifier : #05 UNIX - Linux
1 UDF Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*UDF Sparable Partition"
UDF revision : 2.01 (illegal)
OS Class : #04 UNIX
OS Identifier : #05 UNIX - Linux
Error: 1 error in this EntityID, UDF 2.1.5, 6.3, ECMA 1/7.4.
1 UDF Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*UDF Sparing Table"
UDF revision : 1.50
OS Class : #04 UNIX
OS Identifier : #05 UNIX - Linux
10 Implementation Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*Linux UDFFS"
OS Class : #04 UNIX
OS Identifier : #05 UNIX - Linux
1 Application Entity Identifier
Identifier : "*Linux mkudffs"
Implementation Use : #04 #05 #00 #00 #00 #00 #00 #00
1 Application Entity Identifier
Identifier : "+NSR02"
1 error found in EntityID summary
These EntityIDs are also shown above when read for the first time
====> Final verify status report
Final UDF Revision range: 1.50 only
File System info
last valid block : 197951
block size : 2048
packet length : 32
nmb of sessions : 1
verify session : 1
session starts : 0
medium WR type : rewritable
medium SE type : nonsequential
Error count: 15 total occurrences: 81
Warning count: 0 total occurrences: 0
Note the UDF Entity Identifier on the mkudffs formatted disc... this doesn't
seem right...? i specified the UDF revision to be 1.5!
Is there something i'm missing out on, or did i actually spot a bug? :)
gustavo