[opensuse-packaging] New devel project proposal: storage
I'm currently cleaning up the home:hennevogel:TODO project and discussed with Hannes the following: Create: * storage:fcoe (and move network:fcoe to it) * storage:scsi - for userspace scsi stuff like scsi-eventd * storage:admin: could contain e.g. smartmontools Does the above make sense and should we create these devel projects? Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger, Program Manager openSUSE, aj@{novell.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi | Identica: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag 28 Oktober 2010 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
I'm currently cleaning up the home:hennevogel:TODO project and discussed with Hannes the following:
Create: * storage:fcoe (and move network:fcoe to it) * storage:scsi - for userspace scsi stuff like scsi-eventd * storage:admin: could contain e.g. smartmontools
Does the above make sense and should we create these devel projects? This sounds like major overkill to me ;(
Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
Am Donnerstag, 28. Oktober 2010, 11:24:29 schrieb Andreas Jaeger:
I'm currently cleaning up the home:hennevogel:TODO project and discussed with Hannes the following:
Create: * storage:fcoe (and move network:fcoe to it) * storage:scsi - for userspace scsi stuff like scsi-eventd * storage:admin: could contain e.g. smartmontools
Does the above make sense and should we create these devel projects?
The project names are IMHO less important. More important is which packages do interact with which other packages. Means when two packages have influence to each other, they should get tested together and submitted together. if all of them are just leave packages, you could also merge it into one project... -- Adrian Schroeter SUSE Linux Products GmbH email: adrian@suse.de -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:38:11AM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The project names are IMHO less important. More important is which packages do interact with which other packages.
Means when two packages have influence to each other, they should get tested together and submitted together.
IMHO the most important thing is that the devel projects should reflect the groups of people that work on the packages. It makes no sense to create projects nobody feels responsible for. Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF Markus Rex, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
On 10/28/2010 11:44 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:38:11AM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The project names are IMHO less important. More important is which packages do interact with which other packages.
Means when two packages have influence to each other, they should get tested together and submitted together.
IMHO the most important thing is that the devel projects should reflect the groups of people that work on the packages.
It makes no sense to create projects nobody feels responsible for.
Hmm; for the storage project I would take over maintainership. After all, it was upon my suggestion that AJ made the proposal. What about the following proposal: Projects storage:fcoe moved network:fcoe storage:testing containing bonnie, dt (currently in my home directory), fio (from project benchmark), blktrace etc storage:scsi containing scsi-eventd, sg3_utils etc storage:iscsi moved from drivers:iscsi Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
Hey, On 28.10.2010 12:08, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
On 10/28/2010 11:44 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:38:11AM +0200, Adrian Schröter wrote:
The project names are IMHO less important. More important is which packages do interact with which other packages.
Means when two packages have influence to each other, they should get tested together and submitted together.
IMHO the most important thing is that the devel projects should reflect the groups of people that work on the packages.
It makes no sense to create projects nobody feels responsible for.
Hmm; for the storage project I would take over maintainership.
Then everything is easy. Do it like _you_ want :) Henne -- Henne Vogelsang, openSUSE. Everybody has a plan, until they get hit. - Mike Tyson -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+help@opensuse.org
participants (6)
-
Adrian Schröter -
Andreas Jaeger -
Hannes Reinecke -
Henne Vogelsang -
Michael Schroeder -
Stephan Kulow