3. Make mangling style part of library Provides and
How are the chances to reduce surprises from name mangling
by such an approach?
How often were similar attempts discussed already?
The third one sounds feasible, something like
assuming it is possible to detect how library was built.
Would you like to introduce dedicated variables?
I do not know if this information is stored in library
It will finally land in special function names, won't it?
But I guess that it might be inappropriate to consider another
demangle step in the software build process at the end.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe(a)opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner(a)opensuse.org