Messed up google-noto-{sans,serif}-cjk-fonts package on openSUSE:Factory
Hi, I noticed that the google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts package on openSUSE:Factory is a link from openSUSE:Factory/google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts, but it still contains the old contents instead of the linked target. That made Tumbleweed keeping the old packages (that had a higher package number "2017xxx" than the current "2.00x"). How can I fix this mess? When I do osc branch, it'll branch off from the develproject M17N:fonts/google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts from the target link, which is of course nonsense for cleaning up the openSUSE:Factory repo. Ideally speaking, I'd like to separate again those packages into individual repos instead of link, as they have no direct relations at all. But, when I tried to remove google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts.{spec,changes} from *-sans-* repo in the local branch, it resulted in a bad state, so I gave up. If anyone gives a hint how to go further, it'd be appreciated. thanks, Takashi
On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 08:25:45 +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
Hi,
I noticed that the google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts package on openSUSE:Factory is a link from openSUSE:Factory/google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts, but it still contains the old contents instead of the linked target. That made Tumbleweed keeping the old packages (that had a higher package number "2017xxx" than the current "2.00x").
How can I fix this mess? When I do osc branch, it'll branch off from the develproject M17N:fonts/google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts from the target link, which is of course nonsense for cleaning up the openSUSE:Factory repo.
Ideally speaking, I'd like to separate again those packages into individual repos instead of link, as they have no direct relations at all. But, when I tried to remove google-noto-serif-cjk-fonts.{spec,changes} from *-sans-* repo in the local branch, it resulted in a bad state, so I gave up. If anyone gives a hint how to go further, it'd be appreciated.
With the help of Coolo, now the fixes have been submitted to openSUSE:Factory (SR#990774 and SR#990775). Let's see whether this works. thanks, Takashi
participants (1)
-
Takashi Iwai