[opensuse-packaging] Need help understanding E: lto-no-text-in-archive RPMLINT error.
Hello, I have been trying to build Avogadrolibs https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:andythe_great/avogadr... However, this error prevent it from building. E: lto-no-text-in-archive (Badness: 10000) I found this documentation: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO#LTO_enablement_in_openSUSE:Factory Which it says to add the flag %global _lto_cflags %{?_lto_cflags} -ffat-lto-objects to fix the issue which it did. But Science repo maintainer won't accept it as a fix. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780593 So I ask in openSUSE forum, which was told that it got something to do with reproducibility. https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/539911-How-to-detect-GCC-using-CM...) I decide to ask the Avogadro dev to fix the issue but neither me, openSUSE forum admin or Avogadro dev understand why should it be done. https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs/issues/455 Which the issue remain unsolved, so I would like to know what E: lto-no-text-in-archive means so I can tell the Avogadro dev why they should fix it and why it is exclusive to openSUSE. Thanks Andy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
Hello,
I have been trying to build Avogadrolibs
https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:andythe_great/avogadr...
However, this error prevent it from building. E: lto-no-text-in-archive (Badness: 10000)
I found this documentation:
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO#LTO_enablement_in_openSUSE:Factory Which it says to add the flag %global _lto_cflags %{?_lto_cflags} -ffat-lto-objects to fix the issue which it did.
But Science repo maintainer won't accept it as a fix. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780593 But it is correct solution to rpmlint error
So I ask in openSUSE forum, which was told that it got something to do with reproducibility. https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/539911-How-to-detect-GCC-using-CM...) Not related to reproducibility at all
I decide to ask the Avogadro dev to fix the issue but neither me, openSUSE forum admin or Avogadro dev understand why should it be done. https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs/issues/455
Which the issue remain unsolved, so I would like to know what E: lto- no-text-in-archive means so I can tell the Avogadro dev why they should fix it and why it is exclusive to openSUSE. Afaik it is not something upstream should be fixing - for static
Hi On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:42 +0000, andythe_great wrote: libaries extra build flag has to be used, so that static librarr contains both binary and lto bytecode - rpmlint says that you have just bytecode. I suggest you reopen sr#780593 Cheers Martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 09:56:04 CEST Martin Pluskal wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:42 +0000, andythe_great wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to build Avogadrolibs
https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:andythe_great/avoga drolibs/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64
However, this error prevent it from building. E: lto-no-text-in-archive (Badness: 10000)
I found this documentation:
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO#LTO_enablement_in_openSUSE:Factory Which it says to add the flag %global _lto_cflags %{?_lto_cflags} -ffat-lto-objects to fix the issue which it did.
But Science repo maintainer won't accept it as a fix. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780593
But it is correct solution to rpmlint error
It would be a correct solution if the affected library were a library which should be shipped, but thats not the case here - it is just bunch of object files which should be statically linked to the shared libraries (here, dl'opened modules). There is a bugreport I have opened upstream, which has seen some progress lately. There currently is a patch in the package which fixes the problem correctly. Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen phone: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 13:02 +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 09:56:04 CEST Martin Pluskal wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:42 +0000, andythe_great wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to build Avogadrolibs
https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:andythe_great/avoga drolibs/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64
However, this error prevent it from building. E: lto-no-text-in-archive (Badness: 10000)
I found this documentation:
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO#LTO_enablement_in_openSUSE:Factory Which it says to add the flag %global _lto_cflags %{?_lto_cflags} -ffat-lto-objects to fix the issue which it did.
But Science repo maintainer won't accept it as a fix. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780593
But it is correct solution to rpmlint error
It would be a correct solution if the affected library were a library which should be shipped, but thats not the case here - it is just bunch of object files which should be statically linked to the shared libraries (here, dl'opened modules).
There is a bugreport I have opened upstream, which has seen some progress lately.
There currently is a patch in the package which fixes the problem correctly. Well shipping of static libraries is usually undesirable, but existence of /avogadro2/staticplugins suggest that its something that is something that upstream wishes. That being said I wonder why it was not communicated to author of original submit request i.e in sr#780593
Regards Martin -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 13:15:18 CEST Martin Pluskal wrote:
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 13:02 +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 09:56:04 CEST Martin Pluskal wrote:
Hi
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:42 +0000, andythe_great wrote:
Hello,
I have been trying to build Avogadrolibs
https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:andythe_great/a voga drolibs/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64
However, this error prevent it from building. E: lto-no-text-in-archive (Badness: 10000)
I found this documentation:
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO#LTO_enablement_in_openSUSE:Factor y Which it says to add the flag %global _lto_cflags %{?_lto_cflags} -ffat-lto-objects to fix the issue which it did.
But Science repo maintainer won't accept it as a fix. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780593
But it is correct solution to rpmlint error
It would be a correct solution if the affected library were a library which should be shipped, but thats not the case here - it is just bunch of object files which should be statically linked to the shared libraries (here, dl'opened modules).
There is a bugreport I have opened upstream, which has seen some progress lately.
There currently is a patch in the package which fixes the problem correctly.
Well shipping of static libraries is usually undesirable, but existence of /avogadro2/staticplugins suggest that its something that is something that upstream wishes.
Wrong. Thats just an indication upstream also supports static plugins for deployments where dl'opened modules have issues. The library which is mentioned is *not* a module, just a build artifact. But I have already said that, haven't I?
That being said I wonder why it was not communicated to author of original submit request i.e in sr#780593
The submitter has thrown several very low quality submissions over the fence. I have pointed him to the relevant packaging guidelines etc. several times. Have a look at the SR - unmentioned patch, changelog inconsistent with the changes, etc. Patience has limits. Regards, Stefan -- Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen phone: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
On Saturday, May 2, 2020 11:33 AM, Stefan Brüns <stefan.bruens@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 13:15:18 CEST Martin Pluskal wrote:
On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 13:02 +0200, Stefan Brüns wrote:
On Saturday, 2 May 2020 09:56:04 CEST Martin Pluskal wrote:
Hi On Sat, 2020-05-02 at 04:42 +0000, andythe_great wrote:
Hello, I have been trying to build Avogadrolibs https://github.com/OpenChemistry/avogadrolibs https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:andythe_great/a voga drolibs/openSUSE_Tumbleweed/x86_64 However, this error prevent it from building. E: lto-no-text-in-archive (Badness: 10000) I found this documentation: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:LTO#LTO_enablement_in_openSUSE:Factor y Which it says to add the flag %global _lto_cflags %{?_lto_cflags} -ffat-lto-objects to fix the issue which it did. But Science repo maintainer won't accept it as a fix. https://build.opensuse.org/request/show/780593
But it is correct solution to rpmlint error
It would be a correct solution if the affected library were a library which should be shipped, but thats not the case here - it is just bunch of object files which should be statically linked to the shared libraries (here, dl'opened modules). There is a bugreport I have opened upstream, which has seen some progress lately. There currently is a patch in the package which fixes the problem correctly.
Well shipping of static libraries is usually undesirable, but existence of /avogadro2/staticplugins suggest that its something that is something that upstream wishes.
Wrong. Thats just an indication upstream also supports static plugins for deployments where dl'opened modules have issues.
The library which is mentioned is not a module, just a build artifact. But I have already said that, haven't I?
That being said I wonder why it was not communicated to author of original submit request i.e in sr#780593
The submitter has thrown several very low quality submissions over the fence. I have pointed him to the relevant packaging guidelines etc. several times.
Have a look at the SR - unmentioned patch, changelog inconsistent with the changes, etc. Patience has limits.
Regards,
Stefan
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stefan Brüns / Bergstraße 21 / 52062 Aachen phone: +49 241 53809034 mobile: +49 151 50412019
The static libraries is needed for the Avogadroapp that required Avogadrolibs to function properly. But as you mention, it is not the correct approach? The patch which fix the issue is fix_libgwavi_linking.patch isn't it, but this only fix the libgwavi but not the rest of the static library right, so can the same method be applied to the other static libraries? Sorry for the bad sr, I could not find much explanation on the issue. Kind Regards, Andy -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-packaging+owner@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
andythe_great -
Martin Pluskal -
Stefan Brüns